GitLab

U.S. Diplomacy
Since its founding in 1922, Foreign Affairs has been the leading forum for major conversation of American foreign policy and global affairs. The publication has included contributions from numerous leading worldwide affairs professionals.

More Resources

- Feedback
- Institutional Subscriptions
- Gift a Membership
- About Us
- Events
- Issue Archive
- Advertise
- Audio Content
- Account Management
- FAQs
Spy vs. AI

ANNE NEUBERGER is Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Adviser for Cyber and Emerging Technology on the U.S. National Security Council. From 2009 to 2021, she served in senior operational roles in intelligence and cybersecurity at the National Security Agency, consisting of as its very first Chief Risk Officer.

- More by Anne Neuberger
Spy vs. AI

How Artificial Intelligence Will Remake Espionage

Anne Neuberger

-.
Copy Link Copied. Article link: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-aihttps://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-[ai](https://www.eucleiaphoto.com). Copy


Gift Link Copied. This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Sign in.


Create Citation Copied. Chicago MLA APSA APA. Chicago Cite not available at the minute. MLA Cite not available at the moment. APSA Cite not available at the moment. APA Cite not available at the moment


Download PDF. This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Check in.


Request Reprint. Request reprint authorizations here.




In the early 1950s, the United States faced a critical intelligence obstacle in its burgeoning competition with the Soviet Union. Outdated German reconnaissance images from The second world war might no longer provide sufficient intelligence about Soviet military capabilities, and existing U.S. surveillance abilities were no longer able to penetrate the Soviet Union's closed airspace. This shortage stimulated an adventurous moonshot effort: the advancement of the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft. In just a few years, U-2 missions were providing vital intelligence, catching images of Soviet missile setups in Cuba and bringing near-real-time insights from behind the Iron Curtain to the Oval Office.

Today, the United States stands at a comparable point. Competition in between Washington and its competitors over the future of the worldwide order is heightening, and now, much as in the early 1950s, the United States should make the most of its world-class economic sector and adequate capacity for development to outcompete its foes. The U.S. intelligence community should harness the country's sources of strength to deliver insights to policymakers at the speed these days's world. The integration of synthetic intelligence, especially through big language designs, uses groundbreaking chances to improve intelligence operations and analysis, allowing the shipment of faster and more relevant support to decisionmakers. This technological revolution includes considerable disadvantages, however, particularly as enemies exploit similar improvements to discover and counter U.S. intelligence operations. With an AI race underway, the United States must challenge itself to be first-first to gain from AI, first to protect itself from opponents who might use the technology for ill, and first to use AI in line with the laws and worths of a democracy.

For the U.S. nationwide security community, satisfying the pledge and managing the peril of AI will require deep technological and cultural changes and a willingness to alter the method firms work. The U.S. intelligence and military neighborhoods can harness the capacity of AI while reducing its intrinsic risks, guaranteeing that the United States maintains its one-upmanship in a rapidly progressing international landscape. Even as it does so, the United States must transparently convey to the American public, and to populations and partners worldwide, how the country intends to fairly and securely use AI, in compliance with its laws and values.

MORE, BETTER, FASTER

AI's potential to revolutionize the intelligence neighborhood lies in its ability to process and analyze huge amounts of information at unmatched speeds. It can be challenging to examine large amounts of collected data to generate time-sensitive warnings. U.S. intelligence services could take advantage of AI systems' pattern recognition capabilities to recognize and alert human experts to possible threats, such as missile launches or military motions, or important worldwide advancements that experts understand senior U.S. decisionmakers are interested in. This capability would ensure that critical cautions are timely, actionable, and relevant, enabling more efficient reactions to both rapidly emerging risks and emerging policy opportunities. Multimodal designs, which integrate text, images, and audio, enhance this analysis. For example, utilizing AI to cross-reference satellite images with signals intelligence might supply a detailed view of military movements, making it possible for quicker and more accurate hazard assessments and possibly brand-new ways of delivering details to policymakers.

Intelligence experts can likewise offload recurring and time-consuming jobs to machines to concentrate on the most fulfilling work: generating original and deeper analysis, increasing the intelligence neighborhood's general insights and productivity. A fine example of this is foreign language translation. U.S. intelligence firms invested early in AI-powered abilities, and the bet has actually paid off. The abilities of language models have grown increasingly sophisticated and accurate-OpenAI's recently released o1 and o3 models demonstrated considerable development in accuracy and thinking ability-and can be used to even more rapidly translate and summarize text, audio, and video files.

Although obstacles remain, future systems trained on greater amounts of non-English information might be efficient in critical subtle differences between dialects and comprehending the meaning and cultural context of slang or Internet memes. By on these tools, the intelligence neighborhood could concentrate on training a cadre of highly specialized linguists, who can be tough to discover, typically struggle to get through the clearance procedure, and take a long time to train. And naturally, by making more foreign language materials available across the right agencies, U.S. intelligence services would have the ability to more quickly triage the mountain of foreign intelligence they receive to select out the needles in the haystack that truly matter.

The worth of such speed to policymakers can not be underestimated. Models can quickly sift through intelligence information sets, open-source details, and conventional human intelligence and produce draft summaries or initial analytical reports that experts can then validate and improve, guaranteeing the end products are both detailed and accurate. Analysts might partner with an advanced AI assistant to work through analytical issues, test concepts, and brainstorm in a collaborative style, improving each iteration of their analyses and delivering completed intelligence more rapidly.

Consider Israel's experience in January 2018, wikitravel.org when its intelligence service, the Mossad, discreetly burglarized a secret Iranian facility and took about 20 percent of the archives that detailed Iran's nuclear activities between 1999 and 2003. According to Israeli officials, the Mossad gathered some 55,000 pages of documents and a more 55,000 files saved on CDs, including photos and videos-nearly all in Farsi. Once the archive was obtained, senior authorities put tremendous pressure on intelligence professionals to produce detailed evaluations of its content and whether it indicated an ongoing effort to build an Iranian bomb. But it took these specialists several months-and hundreds of hours of labor-to equate each page, evaluate it by hand for appropriate material, and integrate that details into evaluations. With today's AI abilities, the very first 2 actions in that procedure might have been accomplished within days, possibly even hours, permitting experts to comprehend and contextualize the intelligence quickly.

Among the most interesting applications is the method AI could transform how intelligence is taken in by policymakers, allowing them to interact straight with intelligence reports through ChatGPT-like platforms. Such capabilities would permit users to ask specific questions and receive summed up, appropriate details from thousands of reports with source citations, assisting them make notified decisions rapidly.

BRAVE NEW WORLD

Although AI offers many advantages, it also postures significant brand-new risks, especially as foes develop similar innovations. China's advancements in AI, particularly in computer vision and monitoring, threaten U.S. intelligence operations. Because the nation is ruled by an authoritarian regime, it does not have personal privacy constraints and civil liberty securities. That deficit enables massive data collection practices that have actually yielded data sets of enormous size. Government-sanctioned AI models are trained on large amounts of personal and behavioral data that can then be used for various functions, such as surveillance and social control. The presence of Chinese business, such as Huawei, in telecoms systems and software application around the world could provide China with all set access to bulk data, significantly bulk images that can be utilized to train facial recognition models, a specific issue in nations with large U.S. military bases. The U.S. national security neighborhood need to consider how Chinese designs developed on such comprehensive information sets can give China a tactical benefit.

And it is not just China. The expansion of "open source" AI models, such as Meta's Llama and those created by the French business Mistral AI and the Chinese company DeepSeek, is putting powerful AI capabilities into the hands of users around the world at fairly economical expenses. A lot of these users are benign, however some are not-including authoritarian programs, cyber-hackers, and criminal gangs. These malign stars are utilizing large language designs to rapidly generate and spread incorrect and malicious content or to conduct cyberattacks. As witnessed with other intelligence-related innovations, such as signals intercept capabilities and unmanned drones, China, Iran, and Russia will have every incentive to share some of their AI developments with client states and subnational groups, such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Wagner paramilitary business, therefore increasing the risk to the United States and its allies.

The U.S. military and intelligence neighborhood's AI designs will become appealing targets for enemies. As they grow more powerful and main to U.S. nationwide security decision-making, intelligence AIs will become critical national properties that need to be safeguarded against adversaries looking for to jeopardize or manipulate them. The intelligence community should buy developing safe AI designs and in developing requirements for "red teaming" and constant evaluation to protect against potential threats. These teams can use AI to replicate attacks, revealing potential weaknesses and establishing methods to reduce them. Proactive measures, consisting of partnership with allies on and investment in counter-AI technologies, will be important.

THE NEW NORMAL

These difficulties can not be wished away. Waiting too wish for AI innovations to fully mature brings its own threats; U.S. intelligence capacities will fall behind those of China, Russia, and other powers that are going full steam ahead in developing AI. To ensure that intelligence-whether time-sensitive cautions or longer-term strategic insight-continues to be a benefit for the United States and its allies, photorum.eclat-mauve.fr the nation's intelligence neighborhood needs to adapt and innovate. The intelligence services need to rapidly master using AI technologies and make AI a foundational element in their work. This is the only sure way to guarantee that future U.S. presidents receive the very best possible intelligence support, remain ahead of their adversaries, and protect the United States' sensitive abilities and operations. Implementing these changes will need a cultural shift within the intelligence neighborhood. Today, intelligence experts mainly build products from raw intelligence and data, with some assistance from existing AI designs for voice and imagery analysis. Progressing, intelligence authorities must explore including a hybrid technique, in line with existing laws, using AI designs trained on unclassified commercially available data and fine-tuned with classified details. This amalgam of technology and standard intelligence gathering could result in an AI entity offering instructions to imagery, signals, open source, and measurement systems on the basis of an incorporated view of normal and anomalous activity, automated images analysis, and automatic voice translation.

To speed up the shift, intelligence leaders must promote the advantages of AI combination, emphasizing the improved abilities and performance it provides. The cadre of newly appointed chief AI officers has been established in U.S. intelligence and defense to serve as leads within their agencies for promoting AI innovation and getting rid of barriers to the innovation's application. Pilot jobs and early wins can construct momentum and confidence in AI's capabilities, encouraging more comprehensive adoption. These officers can take advantage of the knowledge of national labs and other partners to evaluate and refine AI models, guaranteeing their efficiency and security. To institutionalize change, leaders should produce other organizational rewards, consisting of promotions and training chances, to reward innovative methods and those workers and units that show effective usage of AI.

The White House has actually produced the policy needed for the usage of AI in national security firms. President Joe Biden's 2023 executive order regarding safe, safe, and reliable AI detailed the assistance needed to fairly and securely use the technology, wiki.whenparked.com and National Security Memorandum 25, provided in October 2024, is the nation's foundational method for harnessing the power and handling the risks of AI to advance nationwide security. Now, Congress will need to do its part. Appropriations are needed for departments and agencies to develop the infrastructure required for innovation and experimentation, conduct and scale pilot activities and evaluations, and continue to invest in assessment capabilities to make sure that the United States is constructing reputable and high-performing AI innovations.

Intelligence and military communities are committed to keeping humans at the heart of AI-assisted decision-making and have created the structures and tools to do so. Agencies will need guidelines for how their experts ought to use AI designs to make certain that intelligence products satisfy the intelligence community's requirements for dependability. The government will also require to maintain clear assistance for managing the data of U.S. people when it pertains to the training and use of large language models. It will be very important to stabilize the use of emerging innovations with securing the personal privacy and civil liberties of people. This implies enhancing oversight mechanisms, updating appropriate frameworks to show the capabilities and dangers of AI, and cultivating a culture of AI advancement within the national security apparatus that harnesses the potential of the technology while securing the rights and freedoms that are fundamental to American society.

Unlike the 1950s, when U.S. intelligence raced to the leading edge of overhead and satellite images by developing a lot of the key innovations itself, winning the AI race will need that community to reimagine how it partners with private market. The economic sector, which is the main ways through which the federal government can understand AI development at scale, is investing billions of dollars in AI-related research, data centers, and computing power. Given those business' advancements, intelligence agencies must focus on leveraging commercially available AI designs and improving them with classified information. This approach enables the intelligence community to rapidly expand its capabilities without needing to start from scratch, permitting it to remain competitive with enemies. A recent partnership in between NASA and IBM to develop the world's biggest geospatial foundation model-and the subsequent release of the model to the AI community as an open-source project-is an exemplary presentation of how this kind of public-private partnership can operate in practice.

As the national security community integrates AI into its work, it should guarantee the security and resilience of its designs. Establishing requirements to deploy generative AI safely is important for maintaining the stability of AI-driven intelligence operations. This is a core focus of the National Security Agency's new AI Security Center and its partnership with the Department of Commerce's AI Safety Institute.

As the United States deals with growing rivalry to shape the future of the worldwide order, it is immediate that its intelligence companies and military capitalize on the nation's development and leadership in AI, focusing particularly on big language models, to offer faster and more relevant details to policymakers. Only then will they gain the speed, breadth, and depth of insight needed to navigate a more complicated, competitive, and content-rich world.