GitLab

Employment discrimination law in the United States originates from the common law, and is codified in various state, federal, and regional laws. These laws forbid discrimination based on particular attributes or "secured classifications". The United States Constitution likewise restricts discrimination by federal and state governments against their public workers. Discrimination in the economic sector is not directly constrained by the Constitution, but has become based on a growing body of federal and state law, consisting of the Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964. Federal law prohibits discrimination in a number of areas, including recruiting, hiring, task evaluations, promo policies, training, compensation and disciplinary action. State laws typically extend security to extra classifications or companies.

Under federal employment discrimination law, employers generally can not victimize workers on the basis of race, [1] sex [1] [2] (consisting of sexual orientation and gender identity), [3] pregnancy, [4] religious beliefs, [1] nationwide origin, [1] disability (physical or mental, consisting of status), [5] [6] age (for employees over 40), [7] military service or association, [8] personal bankruptcy or uncollectable bills, [9] genetic details, [10] and citizenship status (for people, long-term homeowners, temporary homeowners, refugees, and asylees). [11]
List of United States federal discrimination law

Equal Pay Act of 1963 Civil Liberty Act of 1964 Title VI of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Title IX


Constitutional basis

The United States Constitution does not directly resolve work discrimination, however its prohibitions on discrimination by the federal government have actually been held to secure federal civil servant.

The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution limit the power of the federal and state federal governments to discriminate. The Fifth Amendment has a specific requirement that the federal government does not deprive individuals of "life, liberty, or residential or commercial property", without due procedure of the law. It also contains an implicit warranty that the Fourteenth Amendment explicitly restricts states from breaking a person's rights of due process and equivalent protection. In the work context, these Constitutional provisions would limit the right of the state and federal governments to discriminate in their work practices by treating workers, former workers, or job candidates unequally because of membership in a group (such as a race or sex). Due process defense requires that civil servant have a fair procedural process before they are terminated if the termination is associated with a "liberty" (such as the right to free speech) or residential or commercial property interest. As both Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses are passive, the stipulation that empowers Congress to pass anti-discrimination bills (so they are not unconstitutional under Tenth Amendment) is Section 5 of Fourteenth Amendment.

Employment discrimination or harassment in the personal sector is not unconstitutional since Federal and most State Constitutions do not expressly offer their respective federal government the power to enact civil liberties laws that apply to the economic sector. The Federal government's authority to control a personal organization, including civil liberties laws, comes from their power to manage all commerce in between the States. Some State Constitutions do expressly afford some security from public and private work discrimination, such as Article I of the California Constitution. However, most State Constitutions only attend to prejudiced treatment by the government, consisting of a public company.

Absent of a provision in a State Constitution, State civil liberties laws that regulate the private sector are usually Constitutional under the "authorities powers" doctrine or the power of a State to enact laws created to protect public health, security and morals. All States need to adhere to the Federal Civil liberty laws, however States may enact civil rights laws that provide additional work security.

For instance, some State civil liberties laws use defense from work discrimination on the basis of political association, despite the fact that such kinds of discrimination are not yet covered in federal civil liberties laws.

History of federal laws

Federal law governing employment discrimination has established in time.

The Equal Pay Act amended the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1963. It is enforced by the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor. [12] The Equal Pay Act prohibits companies and unions from paying different wages based on sex. It does not forbid other discriminatory practices in employing. It provides that where employees carry out equal operate in the corner needing "equal ability, effort, and obligation and performed under comparable working conditions," they must be provided equivalent pay. [2] The Fair Labor Standards Act uses to employers engaged in some aspect of interstate commerce, or all of a company's employees if the business is engaged as a whole in a substantial quantity of interstate commerce. [citation required]
Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination in a lot more elements of the work relationship. "Title VII created the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to administer the act". [12] It uses to a lot of employers participated in interstate commerce with more than 15 staff members, labor organizations, and employment service. Title VII restricts discrimination based on race, color, faith, sex or nationwide origin. It makes it unlawful for employers to discriminate based upon secured characteristics concerning terms, conditions, and opportunities of work. Employment service might not discriminate when hiring or referring candidates, and labor organizations are also forbidden from basing membership or union categories on race, color, religious beliefs, sex, or national origin. [1] The Pregnancy Discrimination Act changed Title VII in 1978, specifying that illegal sex discrimination consists of discrimination based on pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions. [4] An associated statute, the Family and Medical Leave Act, sets requirements governing leave for pregnancy and pregnancy-related conditions. [13]
Executive Order 11246 in 1965 "restricts discrimination by federal professionals and subcontractors on account of race, color, faith, sex, or national origin [and] needs affirmative action by federal professionals". [14]
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), enacted in 1968 and modified in 1978 and 1986, prohibits companies from discriminating on the basis of age. The restricted practices are almost identical to those laid out in Title VII, except that the ADEA secures employees in firms with 20 or more workers instead of 15 or more. A worker is secured from discrimination based on age if he or she is over 40. Since 1978, the ADEA has phased out and employment forbade compulsory retirement, other than for high-powered decision-making positions (that also offer big pensions). The ADEA contains specific standards for benefit, pension and retirement plans. [7] Though ADEA is the center of a lot of conversation of age discrimination legislation, there is a longer history starting with the abolishment of "optimal ages of entry into employment in 1956" by the United States Civil Service Commission. Then in 1964, Executive Order 11141 "established a policy versus age discrimination among federal contractors". [15]
The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 forbids employment discrimination on the basis of special needs by the federal government, federal specialists with contracts of more than $10,000, and programs getting federal financial assistance. [16] It needs affirmative action along with non-discrimination. [16] Section 504 needs reasonable accommodation, and Section 508 needs that electronic and details technology be accessible to disabled employees. [16]
The Black Lung Benefits Act of 1972 prohibits discrimination by mine operators versus miners who experience "black lung disease" (pneumoconiosis). [17]
The Vietnam Era Readjustment Act of 1974 "requires affirmative action for disabled and Vietnam period veterans by federal contractors". [14]
The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 restricts work discrimination on the basis of bankruptcy or bad financial obligations. [9]
The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 restricts employers with more than 3 employees from victimizing anyone (except an unauthorized immigrant) on the basis of nationwide origin or citizenship status. [18]
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) was enacted to eliminate inequitable barriers versus qualified individuals with disabilities, people with a record of a special needs, or people who are considered as having a disability. It forbids discrimination based on genuine or perceived physical or mental disabilities. It likewise needs companies to supply reasonable accommodations to workers who require them because of a disability to request a task, perform the vital functions of a job, or take pleasure in the advantages and opportunities of employment, unless the employer can reveal that excessive challenge will result. There are rigorous constraints on when a company can ask disability-related concerns or need medical checkups, and all medical details should be treated as private. A disability is specified under the ADA as a mental or physical health condition that "considerably restricts one or more significant life activities. " [5]
The Nineteenth Century Civil Liberty Acts, amended in 1993, make sure all individuals equal rights under the law and outline the damages available to plaintiffs in actions brought under Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the 1973 Rehabilitation Act. [19] [20]
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 bars companies from utilizing people' hereditary details when making hiring, firing, job positioning, or promo choices. [10]
The proposed US Equality Act of 2015 would ban discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. [21] Since June 2018 [upgrade], 28 US states do not explicitly consist of sexual orientation and 29 US states do not explicitly consist of gender identity within anti-discrimination statutes.

LGBT employment discrimination

Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of sexual preference or gender identity. This is encompassed by the law's prohibition of work discrimination on the basis of sex. Prior to the landmark cases Bostock v. Clayton County and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2020 ), work protections for LGBT individuals were patchwork; several states and localities explicitly prohibit harassment and bias in employment decisions on the basis of sexual preference and/or gender identity, although some only cover public staff members. [22] Prior to the Bostock decision, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) translated Title VII to cover LGBT staff members; the EEOC's determined that transgender employees were secured under Title VII in 2012, [23] and extended the protection to incorporate sexual preference in 2015. [24] [25]
According to Crosby Burns and Jeff Krehely: "Studies show that anywhere from 15 percent to 43 percent of gay people have experienced some type of discrimination and harassment at the office. Moreover, an incredible 90 percent of transgender workers report some form of harassment or mistreatment on the job." Many individuals in the LGBT community have actually lost their job, consisting of Vandy Beth Glenn, a transgender lady who claims that her manager informed her that her existence might make other individuals feel uneasy. [26]
Almost half of the United States likewise have state-level or municipal-level laws banning the discrimination of gender non-conforming and transgender people in both public and private offices. A couple of more states ban LGBT discrimination in just public workplaces. [27] Some challengers of these laws believe that it would invade spiritual liberty, although these laws are focused more on prejudiced actions, not beliefs. Courts have actually likewise identified that these laws do not infringe free speech or spiritual liberty. [28]
State law

State statutes likewise offer substantial defense from work discrimination. Some laws extend similar security as offered by the federal acts to companies who are not covered by those statutes. Other statutes offer security to groups not covered by the federal acts. Some state laws offer greater defense to employees of the state or of state professionals.

The following table lists categories not protected by federal law. Age is consisted of too, because federal law just covers workers over 40.

In addition,

- District of Columbia - enlisting, personal look [35]- Michigan - height, weight [53]- Texas - Participation in emergency situation evacuation order [90]- Vermont - Birthplace [76]
Government staff members

Title VII also applies to state, federal, regional and other public employees. Employees of federal and state federal governments have extra defenses versus work discrimination.

The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 forbids discrimination in federal employment on the basis of conduct that does not impact job efficiency. The Office of Personnel Management has actually interpreted this as forbiding discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. [91] In June 2009, it was revealed that the interpretation would be broadened to consist of gender identity. [92]
Additionally, public workers retain their First Amendment rights, whereas personal companies have the right to limitations employees' speech in specific ways. [93] Public staff members maintain their First Amendment rights insofar as they are speaking as a civilian (not on behalf of their company), they are speaking on a matter of public issue, and their speech is not interfering with their task. [93]
Federal employees who have employment discrimination claims, such as postal workers of the United States Postal Service (USPS) need to sue in the correct federal jurisdiction, which postures a various set of issues for complainants.

Exceptions

Bona fide occupational credentials

Employers are generally allowed to think about characteristics that would otherwise be discriminatory if they are bona fide occupational qualifications (BFOQ). The most common BFOQ is sex, and the second most typical BFOQ is age. Authentic Occupational Qualifications can not be used for discrimination on the basis of race.

The only exception to this rule is shown in a single case, Wittmer v. Peters, where the court guidelines that law enforcement surveillance can match races when necessary. For circumstances, if police are running operations that include personal informants, or undercover agents, sending out an African American officer into a sting for a KKK white supremacy group. Additionally, cops departments, such as the department in Ferguson, Missouri, can consider race-based policing and hire officers that are in proportion to the neighborhood's racial makeup. [94]
BFOQs do not use in the entertainment industry, such as casting for films and television. [95] Directors, producers and casting staff are permitted to cast characters based upon physical characteristics, such as race, sex, hair color, eye color, weight, and so on. Employment discrimination claims for Disparate Treatment are unusual in the home entertainment industry, specifically in entertainers. [95] This validation is unique to the show business, and does not move to other markets, such as retail or food. [95]
Often, employers will utilize BFOQ as a defense to a Disparate Treatment theory work discrimination. BFOQ can not be an in wage spaces between various groups of employees. [96] Cost can be considered when a company should balance personal privacy and security interest in the number of positions that an employer are attempting to fill. [96]
Additionally, customer choice alone can not be a validation unless there is a personal privacy or safety defense. [96] For example, retail facilities in backwoods can not restrict African American clerks based on the racial ideologies of the consumer base. But, matching genders for staffing at facilities that manage kids survivors of sexual assault is allowed.

If a company were trying to show that work discrimination was based on a BFOQ, there must be a factual basis for thinking that all or substantially all members of a class would be unable to perform the task safely and efficiently or that it is impractical to figure out qualifications on a customized basis. [97] Additionally, lack of a malicious motive does not convert a facially prejudiced policy into a neutral policy with a discriminatory effect. [97] Employers likewise carry the burden to show that a BFOQ is fairly required, and a lesser inequitable alternative technique does not exist. [98]
Religious work discrimination

"Religious discrimination is treating people in a different way in their work since of their faith, their religions and practices, and/or their ask for accommodation (a change in a workplace guideline or policy) of their faiths and practices. It also consists of dealing with individuals in a different way in their work due to the fact that of their lack of spiritual belief or practice" (Workplace Fairness). [99] According to The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, companies are forbidden from declining to hire a private based on their faith- alike race, employment sex, age, and disability. If a worker thinks that they have actually experienced religious discrimination, they need to resolve this to the supposed offender. On the other hand, workers are protected by the law for reporting job discrimination and have the ability to submit charges with the EEOC. [100] Some locations in the U.S. now have clauses that prohibit discrimination against atheists. The courts and laws of the United States provide specific exemptions in these laws to organizations or organizations that are religious or religiously-affiliated, nevertheless, to varying degrees in different locations, depending on the setting and the context; some of these have actually been supported and others reversed over time.

The most recent and prevalent example of Religious Discrimination is the widespread rejection of the COVID-19 Vaccine. Many workers are utilizing spiritual beliefs against altering the body and preventative medicine as a reason to not get the vaccination. Companies that do not enable staff members to request religious exemptions, or reject their application might be charged by the staff member with work discrimination on the basis of faiths. However, there are certain requirements for workers to present evidence that it is a regards held belief. [101]
Members of the Communist Party

Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 clearly allows discrimination versus members of the Communist Party.

Military

The armed force has actually faced criticism for restricting women from serving in combat roles. In 2016, however, the law was modified to enable them to serve. [102] [103] [104] In the short article published on the PBS website, Henry Louis Gates Jr. blogs about the method which black guys were dealt with in the military throughout the 1940s. According to Gates, during that time the whites offered the African Americans a chance to prove themselves as Americans by having them participate in the war. The National Geographic site states, nevertheless, that when black soldiers joined the Navy, they were only permitted to work as servants; their participation was restricted to the roles of mess attendants, stewards, and cooks. Even when African Americans wished to protect the nation they resided in, they were rejected the power to do so.

The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) protects the task rights of individuals who willingly or involuntarily leave work positions to carry out military service or specific types of service in the National Disaster Medical System. [105] The law likewise restricts companies from victimizing employees for past or present participation or membership in the uniformed services. [105] Policies that provide choice to veterans versus non-veterans has been declared to impose systemic diverse treatment of ladies since there is a large underrepresentation of females in the uniformed services. [106] The court has declined this claim because there was no inequitable intent towards women in this veteran friendly policy. [106]
Unintentional discrimination

Employment practices that do not directly discriminate against a protected classification may still be unlawful if they produce a disparate influence on members of a safeguarded group. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment practices that have an inequitable impact, unless they are related to job performance.

The Act requires the elimination of artificial, arbitrary, and unneeded barriers to employment that run invidiously to discriminate on the basis of race, and, if, as here, an employment practice that runs to omit Negroes can not be shown to be related to job efficiency, it is forbidden, notwithstanding the company's absence of prejudiced intent. [107]
Height and weight requirements have been recognized by the EEOC as having a disparate effect on national origin minorities. [108]
When preventing a disparate effect claim that declares age discrimination, an employer, however, does not require to show need; rather, it needs to merely reveal that its practice is sensible. [citation required]
Enforcing entities

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) translates and enforces the Equal Pay Act, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964, Title I and V of the Americans With Disabilities Act, Sections 501 and 505 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Civil Liberty Act of 1991. [109] The Commission was developed by the Civil liberty Act of 1964. [110] Its enforcement arrangements are included in area 2000e-5 of Title 42, [111] and its guidelines and guidelines are contained in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 1614. [112] Persons wishing to submit fit under Title VII and/or the ADA should tire their administrative solutions by filing an administrative complaint with the EEOC prior to filing their claim in court. [113]
The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs enforces Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act, which prohibits discrimination versus certified people with impairments by federal professionals and subcontractors. [114]
Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, each company has and enforces its own regulations that use to its own programs and to any entities that receive financial support. [16]
The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) implements the anti-discrimination provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1324b, which prohibits discrimination based upon citizenship status or national origin. [115]
State Fair Employment Practices (FEP) workplaces play the EEOC in administering state statutes. [113]
Employment Non-Discrimination Act LGBT employment discrimination in the United States Employment discrimination against persons with rap sheets in the United States Racial wage gap in the United States Gender pay space in the United States Criticism of credit history systems in the United States
References

^ a b c d e "Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964". US EEOC. Archived from the original on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "The Equal Pay Act of 1963". Archived from the original on April 5, 2020. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. ___ (2020 ). ^ a b "Pregnancy Discrimination Act". Archived from the initial on May 12, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ a b "Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, As Amended". ADA.gov. Archived from the original on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Questions and Answers: The Americans with Disabilities Act and Persons with HIV/AIDS". Archived from the original on July 22, 2009. Retrieved July 21, 2009. ^ a b "The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967". Archived from the initial on December 13, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the original on December 11, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b 11 U.S.C. § 525 ^ a b "Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008" (PDF). gpo.gov. May 21, 2008. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 6, 2018. Retrieved January 6, 2015. ^ 8 U.S.C. § 1324b ^ a b Blankenship, Kim M (1993 ). "Bringing Gender and Race in: U.S. Employment Discrimination Policy". Gender and Society. 7 (2 ): 204-226. doi:10.1177/ 089124393007002004. JSTOR 189578. S2CID 144175260. ^ "Family and Medical Leave Act". Archived from the initial on June 18, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ a b Rozmarin, George C (1980 ). "Employment Discrimination Laws and Their Application". Law Notes for the Family Doctor. 16 (1 ): 25-29. JSTOR 44066330. ^ Neumark, D (2003 ). "Age discrimination legislations in the United States" (PDF). Contemporary Economic Policy. 21 (3 ): 297-317. doi:10.1093/ cep/byg012. S2CID 38171380. Archived (PDF) from the initial on June 2, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "Guide to Disability Rights Laws". ADA.gov. December 20, 2023. Archived from the original on November 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "30 USC Sec. 938". Archived from the initial on June 7, 2011. Retrieved July 21, 2009. ^ "Summary of Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986". Archived from the initial on May 6, 2013. Retrieved August 14, 2021. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981 - Equal rights under the law". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on December 16, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981a - Damages in cases of intentional discrimination in work". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the initial on November 27, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA)". Archived from the initial on June 17, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ Tilcsik, András (January 1, 2011). "Pride and Prejudice: Employment Discrimination against Openly Gay Men in the United States". American Journal of Sociology. 117 (2 ): 586-626. doi:10.1086/ 661653. hdl:1807/ 34998. JSTOR 10.1086/ 661653. PMID 22268247. S2CID 23542996. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "In Landmark Ruling, Feds Add Transgendered to Anti-Discrimination Law:: EDGE Boston, MA". Edgeboston.com. April 25, 2012. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Carpenter, Dale (December 14, 2012). "Anti-gay discrimination is sex discrimination, states the EEOC". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Tatectate, Curtis. "EEOC: Federal law prohibits work environment bias versus gays, lesbians, bisexuals|Miami Herald Miami Herald". Miamiherald.com. Archived from the original on April 28, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Burns, Crosby; Krehely, Jeff (June 2, 2011). "Gay and Transgender People Face High Rates of Workplace Discrimination and Harassment". Center for American Progress. Archived from the initial on November 26, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ "Sexual Preference Discrimination in the Workplace". FindLaw. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2021. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ Lowndes, Coleman; Maza, Carlos (September 23, 2014). "The Top Five Myths About LGBT Non-Discrimination Laws Debunked". Media Matters for America. Archived from the original on June 17, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ "Code of Alabama 25-1-21". Archived from the original on July 23, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b c "Alaska Statutes: AS 18.80.220. Unlawful Employment Practices; Exception". touchngo.com. Archived from the original on December 6, 2022. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d e f "Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA)". California Department of Fair Employment and Housing. CA.gov. 2010. Archived from the initial on September 9, 2016. Retrieved September 9, 2016. ^ a b "Colorado Civil liberty Division 2008 Statutes" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on May 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Chapter 814c Sec. 46a-60". Archived from the original on October 17, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Delaware Code Online". delcode.delaware.gov. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d e "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Prohibited Acts of Discrimination" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 23, 2009. Retrieved August 8, 2019. ^ "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Tabulation, General Provisions" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 30, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Statutes & Constitution: View Statutes:-> 2008-> Ch0760-> Section 10: Online Sunshine". www.leg.state.fl.us. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Georgia Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the initial on January 29, 2010. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Hawaii Rev Statutes 378-2". Archived from the original on August 14, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Idaho Commission on Human Rights: Age Discrimination"". Archived from the initial on February 21, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Illinois Human Rights Act". Archived from the original on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Indiana General Assembly". iga.in.gov. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Iowa Code 216.6". Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Kansas Age Discrimination in Employment Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on October 6, 2008. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Kentucky Revised Statutes 344.040" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on October 8, 2009. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:352". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:312". Archived from the initial on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:311". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Title 5, Chapter 337: HUMAN RIGHTS ACT". www.mainelegislature.org. Archived from the initial on February 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Annotated Code of Maryland 49B.16". Archived from the original on September 29, 2011. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "M.G.L. 151B § 4". Archived from the initial on July 7, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "M.G.L 151B § 1". Archived from the initial on June 4, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on December 26, 2014. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Minnesota Statutes, section 363A.08". Archived from the original on September 6, 2015. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 213.055 R.S.Mo". Archived from the original on May 23, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Montana Code Annotated 49-2-303". Archived from the initial on September 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Nebraska Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the original on November 26, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "NRS: CHAPTER 613 - EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES". www.leg.state.nv.us. Archived from the initial on December 24, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Section 354-A:7 Unlawful Discriminatory Practices". Archived from the initial on January 2, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (N.J.S.A. 10:5 -12)". ^ a b c "2006 New Mexico Statutes - Section 28-1-7 - Unlawful discriminatory practice". Justia Law. Archived from the original on September 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "New york city State Executive Law, Article 15, Section 296". Archived from the original on October 4, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "New York Labor Law Section 201-D - Discrimination against the engagement in particular activities. - New York Attorney Resources - New York Laws". law.onecle.com. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "North Dakota Human Rights Act" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 18, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "2006 Ohio Revised Code -:: 4112. Civil Rights Commission". Justia Law. Archived from the original on March 9, 2016. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Oklahoma Attorney General|". www.oag.ok.gov. Archived from the initial on December 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 659A". Archived from the initial on August 16, 2023. Retrieved October 17, 2019. ^ "Laws Administered by the Pennsylvania Human Rights Commission" (PDF). [long-term dead link] ^ "State of Rhode Island General Assembly". www.rilegislature.gov. Archived from the initial on October 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "South Carolina Human Affairs Law". Archived from the initial on May 6, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "Tennessee State Government - TN.gov". www.tn.gov. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 21. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the initial on September 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Utah Code 34A-5-106". Archived from the initial on July 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Vermont Fair Employment Practices Act" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on June 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "Virginia Human Rights Act". Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "RCW 49.60.180: Unfair practices of companies". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on November 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.60.172: Unfair practices with regard to HIV or hepatitis C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.60.174: Evaluation of claim of discrimination-Actual or perceived HIV or liver disease C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.44.090: Unfair practices in work due to the fact that of age of staff member or applicant-Exceptions". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "State of West Virginia" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "Wisconsin Statutes Tabulation". docs.legis.wisconsin.gov. Archived from the original on November 3, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ Wyoming Code 27-9-105 [long-term dead link] ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 3" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009. ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 5" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009. ^ a b "Puerto Rico Laws 29-I-7-146". Archived from the initial on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Puerto Rico Laws PR 29-I-7-151". Archived from the original on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Virgin Islands Code on Employment Discrimination § 451". Archived from the initial on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 22. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION FOR PARTICIPATING IN EMERGENCY EVACUATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the original on June 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Addressing Sexual Preference Discrimination In Federal Civilian Employment: A Guide to Employee's Rights". Archived from the original on January 14, 2007. ^ Rutenberg, Jim (June 24, 2009). "New Protections for Transgender Federal Workers (Published 2009)". The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. ^ a b "Federal Employee Speech & the First Amendment|ACLU of DC". www.acludc.org. November 9, 2017. Archived from the initial on September 21, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Justice Department Announces Findings of Two Civil Liberties Investigations in Ferguson, Missouri". www.justice.gov. March 4, 2015. Archived from the original on August 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b c "When is it legal for an employer to discriminate in their employing practices based on an Authentic Occupation Qualification?". University of Cincinnati Law Review Blog. April 27, 2016. Archived from the original on April 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b c "CM-625 Bona Fide Occupational Qualifications". US EEOC. January 2, 1982. Archived from the original on December 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b "United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, 499 U.S. 187 (1991 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Religious Discrimination - Workplace Fairness". www.workplacefairness.org. Archived from the original on November 12, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Questions and Answers about Religious Discrimination in the Workplace". www.eeoc.gov. January 31, 2011. Archived from the initial on March 5, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Sincerely Held or Suddenly Held Religious Exemptions to Vaccination?". www.americanbar.org. Archived from the original on December 19, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ Thom Patterson (November 10, 2016). "Prepare for more US women in fight". CNN. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ http://www.militaryaerospace.com/blogs/mil-aero-blog/2012/12/conspicuous-gallantry-doris-miller-at-pearl-harbor-was-one-of-world-war-ii-s-first-heroes.html Archived May 30, 2023, at the Wayback Machine [1] ^ Gates, Henry Louis; Root, Jr|Originally posted on The (January 14, 2013). "Segregation in the Armed Forces During The Second World War|African American History Blog". The African Americans: Many Rivers to Cross. Archived from the original on June 21, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ a b "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the original on December 11, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b "Personnel Adm'r of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256 (1979 )". Justia Law. Archived from the original on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions". Findlaw. Archived from the initial on August 25, 2019. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Shaping Employment Discrimination Law". Archived from the initial on May 11, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "Federal Equal Job Opportunity (EEO) Laws". Archived from the initial on August 6, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "Pre 1965: Events Causing the Creation of EEOC". Archived from the original on August 26, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 2000e-5 - Enforcement provisions". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the initial on November 1, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "PART 1614-- FEDERAL SECTOR EQUAL JOB OPPORTUNITY". Archived from the initial on July 27, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ a b "Filing a Charge of Employment Discrimination". Archived from the initial on August 12, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 503". Archived from the original on August 2, 2009. Retrieved August 1, 2009. ^ "An Overview of the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices". Archived from the initial on May 31, 2009. Retrieved July 30, 2009. External links

Directory of state labor departments, from the U.S. Department of Labor Disability Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission Sex-Based Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission Your Rights At Work (Connecticut).

• Barnes, Patricia G., (2014 ), Betrayed: The Legalization of Age Discrimination in the Workplace. The author, an attorney and judge, argues that the U.S. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 fails to secure older workers. Weak to begin with, she mentions that the ADEA has actually been devitalized by the U.S. Supreme Court.
• Tweedy, Ann E. and Karen Yescavage, Employment Discrimination Against Bisexuals: An Empirical Study, 21 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L.