GitLab

Employment discrimination law in the United States originates from the typical law, and is codified in various state, federal, and local laws. These laws prohibit discrimination based on specific characteristics or "protected categories". The United States Constitution also forbids discrimination by federal and state governments against their public employees. Discrimination in the economic sector is not directly constrained by the Constitution, however has actually become based on a growing body of federal and state law, including the Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964. Federal law prohibits discrimination in a variety of locations, consisting of recruiting, working with, job assessments, promo policies, training, payment and disciplinary action. State laws typically extend defense to additional classifications or companies.

Under federal employment discrimination law, employers normally can not discriminate against workers on the basis of race, [1] sex [1] [2] (consisting of sexual preference and gender identity), [3] pregnancy, [4] religion, [1] national origin, [1] impairment (physical or psychological, consisting of status), [5] [6] age (for workers over 40), [7] military service or association, [8] bankruptcy or bad debts, [9] genetic details, [10] and citizenship status (for people, irreversible residents, short-term citizens, refugees, and asylees). [11]
List of United States federal discrimination law

Equal Pay Act of 1963 Civil Liberty Act of 1964 Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964
Title IX


Constitutional basis

The United States Constitution does not directly resolve employment discrimination, but its prohibitions on discrimination by the federal government have been held to safeguard federal government workers.

The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution limit the power of the federal and state governments to discriminate. The Fifth Amendment has a specific requirement that the federal government does not deny individuals of "life, liberty, or home", without due procedure of the law. It likewise includes an implicit assurance that the Fourteenth Amendment explicitly restricts states from violating an individual's rights of due procedure and equal security. In the work context, these Constitutional provisions would limit the right of the state and federal governments to discriminate in their work practices by dealing with workers, previous staff members, or job candidates unequally due to the fact that of membership in a group (such as a race or sex). Due process protection needs that government workers have a reasonable procedural procedure before they are ended if the termination is connected to a "liberty" (such as the right to complimentary speech) or property interest. As both Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses are passive, the provision that empowers Congress to pass anti-discrimination bills (so they are not unconstitutional under Tenth Amendment) is Section 5 of Fourteenth Amendment.

Employment discrimination or harassment in the private sector is not unconstitutional because Federal and most State Constitutions do not specifically offer their respective government the power to enact civil rights laws that use to the economic sector. The Federal federal government's authority to regulate a personal company, consisting of civil rights laws, originates from their power to control all commerce between the States. Some State Constitutions do specifically manage some security from public and personal employment discrimination, such as Article I of the California Constitution. However, most State Constitutions only attend to discriminatory treatment by the federal government, consisting of a public company.

Absent of an arrangement in a State Constitution, State civil liberties laws that manage the economic sector are normally Constitutional under the "cops powers" doctrine or the power of a State to enact laws developed to protect public health, safety and morals. All States must adhere to the Federal Civil liberty laws, but States might enact civil liberties laws that use additional work defense.

For example, some State civil rights laws provide security from work discrimination on the basis of political affiliation, although such kinds of discrimination are not yet covered in federal civil liberties laws.

History of federal laws

Federal law governing work discrimination has developed over time.

The Equal Pay Act changed the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1963. It is enforced by the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor. [12] The Equal Pay Act restricts companies and unions from paying different earnings based on sex. It does not prohibit other inequitable practices in working with. It offers that where workers carry out equivalent work in the corner needing "equivalent skill, effort, and obligation and carried out under similar working conditions," they should be offered equal pay. [2] The Fair Labor Standards Act uses to employers engaged in some element of interstate commerce, or all of an employer's employees if the enterprise is engaged as a whole in a considerable quantity of interstate commerce. [citation required]
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 forbids discrimination in lots of more elements of the work relationship. "Title VII produced the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to administer the act". [12] It applies to a lot of employers participated in interstate commerce with more than 15 workers, labor organizations, and work firms. Title VII prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin. It makes it prohibited for employers to discriminate based upon secured attributes relating to terms, conditions, and opportunities of employment. Employment service might not discriminate when hiring or referring applicants, and labor organizations are likewise forbidden from basing membership or union classifications on race, color, religious beliefs, sex, or nationwide origin. [1] The Pregnancy Discrimination Act amended Title VII in 1978, specifying that illegal sex discrimination consists of discrimination based upon pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions. [4] A related statute, the Family and Medical Leave Act, sets requirements governing leave for pregnancy and pregnancy-related conditions. [13]
Executive Order 11246 in 1965 "forbids discrimination by federal contractors and subcontractors on account of race, color, faith, sex, or national origin [and] requires affirmative action by federal contractors". [14]
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), enacted in 1968 and amended in 1978 and 1986, restricts employers from discriminating on the basis of age. The restricted practices are nearly identical to those outlined in Title VII, except that the ADEA safeguards workers in firms with 20 or more employees instead of 15 or more. An employee is secured from discrimination based upon age if she or he is over 40. Since 1978, the ADEA has actually phased out and forbade mandatory retirement, other than for high-powered decision-making positions (that likewise offer big pensions). The ADEA includes specific standards for advantage, pension and retirement plans. [7] Though ADEA is the center of most conversation of age discrimination legislation, there is a longer history starting with the abolishment of "maximum ages of entry into work in 1956" by the United States Civil Service Commission. Then in 1964, Executive Order 11141 "established a policy versus age discrimination among federal professionals". [15]
The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 forbids work discrimination on the basis of impairment by the federal government, federal contractors with contracts of more than $10,000, and programs getting federal monetary help. [16] It needs affirmative action in addition to non-discrimination. [16] Section 504 needs affordable accommodation, and Section 508 needs that electronic and information innovation be accessible to disabled employees. [16]
The Black Lung Benefits Act of 1972 forbids discrimination by mine operators against miners who suffer from "black lung disease" (pneumoconiosis). [17]
The Vietnam Era Readjustment Act of 1974 "requires affirmative action for handicapped and Vietnam age veterans by federal contractors". [14]
The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 forbids employment discrimination on the basis of bankruptcy or bad financial obligations. [9]
The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 restricts employers with more than 3 workers from discriminating against anybody (except an unapproved immigrant) on the basis of nationwide origin or citizenship status. [18]
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) was enacted to eliminate discriminatory barriers versus certified people with impairments, individuals with a record of a special needs, or individuals who are related to as having a disability. It prohibits discrimination based upon genuine or viewed physical or mental impairments. It likewise needs employers to offer reasonable accommodations to staff members who need them due to the fact that of a special needs to use for a job, carry out the essential functions of a task, or delight in the benefits and opportunities of work, unless the employer can show that unnecessary difficulty will result. There are stringent constraints on when an employer can ask disability-related concerns or require medical assessments, and all medical info needs to be dealt with as private. A special needs is defined under the ADA as a psychological or physical health condition that "substantially restricts several significant life activities. " [5]
The Nineteenth Century Civil Rights Acts, modified in 1993, ensure all individuals equal rights under the law and detail the damages readily available to complainants in actions brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the 1973 Rehabilitation Act. [19] [20]
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 bars employers from using individuals' genetic info when making hiring, firing, task positioning, or promotion decisions. [10]
The proposed US Equality Act of 2015 would prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual preference or gender identity. [21] As of June 2018 [upgrade], 28 US states do not clearly include sexual orientation and 29 US states do not clearly consist of gender identity within anti-discrimination statutes.

LGBT employment discrimination

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 restricts work discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. This is encompassed by the law's prohibition of employment discrimination on the basis of sex. Prior to the landmark cases Bostock v. Clayton County and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2020 ), work defenses for LGBT people were patchwork; a number of states and areas explicitly restrict harassment and predisposition in work decisions on the basis of sexual orientation and/or gender identity, although some only cover public employees. [22] Prior to the Bostock choice, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) interpreted Title VII to cover LGBT staff members; the EEOC's identified that transgender employees were secured under Title VII in 2012, [23] and extended the protection to encompass sexual orientation in 2015. [24] [25]
According to Crosby Burns and Jeff Krehely: "Studies reveal that anywhere from 15 percent to 43 percent of gay people have experienced some kind of discrimination and harassment at the work environment. Moreover, a staggering 90 percent of transgender employees report some kind of harassment or mistreatment on the task." Many individuals in the LGBT neighborhood have lost their task, consisting of Vandy Beth Glenn, a transgender lady who declares that her boss told her that her existence may make other individuals feel uneasy. [26]
Almost half of the United States likewise have state-level or municipal-level laws prohibiting the discrimination of gender non-conforming and transgender people in both public and private work environments. A few more states ban LGBT discrimination in just public work environments. [27] Some opponents of these laws believe that it would invade spiritual liberty, although these laws are focused more on discriminatory actions, not beliefs. Courts have also determined that these laws do not infringe free speech or spiritual liberty. [28]
State law

State statutes also offer comprehensive protection from work discrimination. Some laws extend comparable protection as provided by the federal acts to employers who are not covered by those statutes. Other statutes supply protection to groups not covered by the federal acts. Some state laws provide higher protection to employees of the state or of state specialists.

The following table lists categories not safeguarded by federal law. Age is consisted of also, given that federal law only covers employees over 40.

In addition,

- District of Columbia - admission, personal look [35]- Michigan - height, weight [53]- Texas - Participation in emergency situation evacuation order [90]- Vermont - Place of birth [76]
Civil servant

Title VII likewise uses to state, federal, regional and other public employees. Employees of federal and state federal governments have additional protections against employment discrimination.

The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 forbids discrimination in federal employment on the basis of conduct that does not affect job efficiency. The Office of Personnel Management has actually translated this as forbiding discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. [91] In June 2009, it was revealed that the analysis would be expanded to include gender identity. [92]
Additionally, public staff members keep their First Amendment rights, whereas private companies have the right to limits employees' speech in certain ways. [93] Public workers maintain their First Amendment rights insofar as they are speaking as a personal citizen (not on behalf of their employer), they are speaking on a matter of public issue, and their speech is not interfering with their task. [93]
Federal employees who have work discrimination claims, such as postal employees of the United States Postal Service (USPS) must sue in the proper federal jurisdiction, which positions a different set of issues for complainants.

Exceptions

Bona fide occupational credentials

Employers are generally permitted to think about qualities that would otherwise be prejudiced if they are bona fide occupational qualifications (BFOQ). The most typical BFOQ is sex, and the second most common BFOQ is age. Bona Fide Occupational Qualifications can not be utilized for discrimination on the basis of race.

The only exception to this rule is shown in a single case, Wittmer v. Peters, where the court guidelines that police monitoring can match races when necessary. For instance, if authorities are running operations that involve private informants, or undercover agents, sending an African American officer into a sting for a KKK white supremacy group. Additionally, police departments, such as the department in Ferguson, Missouri, can consider race-based policing and hire officers that are in proportion to the neighborhood's racial makeup. [94]
BFOQs do not use in the show business, such as casting for films and television. [95] Directors, manufacturers and casting staff are allowed to cast characters based upon physical characteristics, such as race, sex, hair color, eye color, weight, and so on. Employment discrimination claims for Disparate Treatment are uncommon in the entertainment market, specifically in entertainers. [95] This validation is unique to the show business, and does not transfer to other industries, such as retail or food. [95]
Often, employers will use BFOQ as a defense to a Disparate Treatment theory work discrimination. BFOQ can not be a cost reason in wage spaces between various groups of employees. [96] Cost can be considered when a company needs to balance personal privacy and safety worry about the number of positions that a company are attempting to fill. [96]
Additionally, client choice alone can not be a validation unless there is a personal privacy or security defense. [96] For instance, retail facilities in rural areas can not restrict African American clerks based upon the racial ideologies of the client base. But, matching genders for staffing at centers that manage kids survivors of sexual abuse is allowed.

If an employer were trying to prove that work discrimination was based upon a BFOQ, there should be a factual basis for thinking that all or significantly all members of a class would be unable to perform the task safely and efficiently or that it is unwise to identify credentials on a personalized basis. [97] Additionally, lack of a malevolent motive does not transform a facially inequitable policy into a neutral policy with a prejudiced effect. [97] Employers also carry the concern to reveal that a BFOQ is fairly necessary, and a lower prejudiced alternative approach does not exist. [98]
Religious work discrimination

"Religious discrimination is treating people in a different way in their work because of their religious beliefs, their faiths and practices, and/or their ask for lodging (a modification in a work environment guideline or policy) of their religions and practices. It also consists of treating people in a different way in their work since of their lack of religion or practice" (Workplace Fairness). [99] According to The U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission, employers are prohibited from refusing to hire a private based upon their religion- alike race, sex, age, employment and impairment. If a worker believes that they have actually experienced religious discrimination, they should resolve this to the alleged culprit. On the other hand, staff members are safeguarded by the law for reporting job discrimination and have the ability to submit charges with the EEOC. [100] Some places in the U.S. now have provisions that prohibit discrimination against atheists. The courts and laws of the United States give specific exemptions in these laws to businesses or institutions that are spiritual or religiously-affiliated, nevertheless, to differing degrees in different places, depending on the setting and the context; a few of these have been supported and others reversed over time.

The most recent and employment pervasive example of Religious Discrimination is the extensive rejection of the COVID-19 Vaccine. Many employees are using spiritual beliefs versus changing the body and preventative medication as a justification to not receive the vaccination. Companies that do not enable staff members to make an application for religious exemptions, or reject their application may be charged by the staff member with employment discrimination on the basis of religions. However, there are certain requirements for workers to present evidence that it is a sincerely held belief. [101]
Members of the Communist Party

Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 clearly permits discrimination against members of the Communist Party.

Military

The armed force has faced criticism for prohibiting women from serving in battle roles. In 2016, nevertheless, the law was modified to enable them to serve. [102] [103] [104] In the article published on the PBS site, Henry Louis Gates Jr. blogs about the way in which black men were treated in the military throughout the 1940s. According to Gates, throughout that time the whites provided the African Americans a chance to show themselves as Americans by having them get involved in the war. The National Geographic website states, however, that when black soldiers signed up with the Navy, they were only allowed to work as servants; their participation was limited to the functions of mess attendants, stewards, and cooks. Even when African Americans wished to safeguard the nation they lived in, they were rejected the power to do so.

The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) protects the job rights of individuals who voluntarily or involuntarily leave work positions to carry out military service or specific types of service in the National Disaster Medical System. [105] The law also prohibits employers from victimizing employees for past or present involvement or subscription in the uniformed services. [105] Policies that offer preference to veterans versus non-veterans has been alleged to enforce systemic diverse treatment of ladies due to the fact that there is a large underrepresentation of ladies in the uniformed services. [106] The court has actually rejected this claim due to the fact that there was no prejudiced intent towards women in this veteran friendly policy. [106]
Unintentional discrimination

Employment practices that do not straight victimize a safeguarded classification may still be unlawful if they produce a diverse effect on members of a safeguarded group. Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 forbids work practices that have an inequitable effect, unless they are related to job performance.

The Act requires the removal of synthetic, arbitrary, and unnecessary barriers to employment that operate invidiously to discriminate on the basis of race, and, if, as here, a work practice that runs to leave out Negroes can not be revealed to be connected to job performance, it is restricted, regardless of the employer's lack of inequitable intent. [107]
Height and weight requirements have actually been determined by the EEOC as having a diverse effect on nationwide origin minorities. [108]
When preventing a disparate impact claim that alleges age discrimination, a company, however, does not need to demonstrate requirement; rather, it must just reveal that its practice is affordable. [citation needed]
Enforcing entities

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) analyzes and imposes the Equal Pay Act, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title I and V of the Americans With Disabilities Act, Sections 501 and 505 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Civil Liberty Act of 1991. [109] The Commission was developed by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [110] Its enforcement arrangements are included in section 2000e-5 of Title 42, [111] and its policies and guidelines are included in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 1614. [112] Persons wanting to submit suit under Title VII and/or the ADA need to exhaust their administrative remedies by filing an administrative grievance with the EEOC prior to submitting their claim in court. [113]
The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs enforces Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act, which forbids discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities by federal professionals and subcontractors. [114]
Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, each agency has and enforces its own regulations that use to its own programs and to any entities that get monetary help. [16]
The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) imposes the anti-discrimination arrangements of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1324b, which forbids discrimination based upon citizenship status or national origin. [115]
State Fair Employment Practices (FEP) workplaces take the function of the EEOC in administering state statutes. [113]
See likewise

Employment Non-Discrimination Act LGBT employment discrimination in the United States Employment discrimination against persons with rap sheets in the United States Racial wage gap in the United States Gender pay space in the United States Criticism of credit scoring systems in the United States
References

^ a b c d e "Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964". US EEOC. Archived from the original on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "The Equal Pay Act of 1963". Archived from the original on April 5, 2020. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. ___ (2020 ). ^ a b "Pregnancy Discrimination Act". Archived from the original on May 12, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ a b "Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, As Amended". ADA.gov. Archived from the original on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Questions and Answers: The Americans with Disabilities Act and Persons with HIV/AIDS". Archived from the initial on July 22, 2009. Retrieved July 21, 2009. ^ a b "The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967". Archived from the initial on December 13, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the initial on December 11, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b 11 U.S.C. § 525 ^ a b "Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008" (PDF). gpo.gov. May 21, 2008. Archived (PDF) from the initial on November 6, 2018. Retrieved January 6, 2015. ^ 8 U.S.C. § 1324b ^ a b Blankenship, Kim M (1993 ). "Bringing Gender and Race in: U.S. Employment Discrimination Policy". Gender and Society. 7 (2 ): 204-226. doi:10.1177/ 089124393007002004. JSTOR 189578. S2CID 144175260. ^ "Family and Medical Leave Act". Archived from the initial on June 18, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ a b Rozmarin, George C (1980 ). "Employment Discrimination Laws and Their Application". Law Notes for the General Practitioner. 16 (1 ): 25-29. JSTOR 44066330. ^ Neumark, D (2003 ). "Age discrimination legislations in the United States" (PDF). Contemporary Economic Policy. 21 (3 ): 297-317. doi:10.1093/ cep/byg012. S2CID 38171380. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 2, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "Guide to Disability Rights Laws". ADA.gov. December 20, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "30 USC Sec. 938". Archived from the original on June 7, 2011. Retrieved July 21, 2009. ^ "Summary of Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986". Archived from the original on May 6, 2013. Retrieved August 14, 2021. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981 - Equal rights under the law". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the initial on December 16, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981a - Damages in cases of intentional discrimination in work". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on November 27, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA)". Archived from the original on June 17, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ Tilcsik, András (January 1, 2011). "Pride and Prejudice: Employment Discrimination versus Openly Gay Men in the United States". American Journal of Sociology. 117 (2 ): 586-626. doi:10.1086/ 661653. hdl:1807/ 34998. JSTOR 10.1086/ 661653. PMID 22268247. S2CID 23542996. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "In Landmark Ruling, Feds Add Transgendered to Anti-Discrimination Law:: EDGE Boston, MA". Edgeboston.com. April 25, 2012. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Carpenter, Dale (December 14, 2012). "Anti-gay discrimination is sex discrimination, states the EEOC". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Tatectate, Curtis. "EEOC: Federal law bans work environment predisposition versus gays, lesbians, bisexuals|Miami Herald Miami Herald". Miamiherald.com. Archived from the initial on April 28, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Burns, Crosby; Krehely, Jeff (June 2, 2011). "Gay and Transgender People Face High Rates of Workplace Discrimination and Harassment". Center for American Progress. Archived from the initial on November 26, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ "Sexual Orientation Discrimination in the Workplace". FindLaw. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2021. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ Lowndes, Coleman; Maza, Carlos (September 23, 2014). "The Top Five Myths About LGBT Non-Discrimination Laws Debunked". Media Matters for America. Archived from the original on June 17, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ "Code of Alabama 25-1-21". Archived from the original on July 23, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b c "Alaska Statutes: AS 18.80.220. Unlawful Employment Practices; Exception". touchngo.com. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2022. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d e f "Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA)". California Department of Fair Employment and Housing. CA.gov. 2010. Archived from the original on September 9, 2016. Retrieved September 9, 2016. ^ a b "Colorado Civil Rights Division 2008 Statutes" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on May 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Chapter 814c Sec. 46a-60". Archived from the original on October 17, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Delaware Code Online". delcode.delaware.gov. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d e "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Prohibited Acts of Discrimination" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 23, 2009. Retrieved August 8, 2019. ^ "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Table of Contents, General Provisions" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 30, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Statutes & Constitution: View Statutes:-> 2008-> Ch0760-> Section 10: Online Sunshine". www.leg.state.fl.us. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Georgia Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the initial on January 29, 2010. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Hawaii Rev Statutes 378-2". Archived from the initial on August 14, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Idaho Commission on Human Rights: Age Discrimination"". Archived from the initial on February 21, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Illinois Human Rights Act". Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Indiana General Assembly". iga.in.gov. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Iowa Code 216.6". Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Kansas Age Discrimination in Employment Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on October 6, 2008. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Kentucky Revised Statutes 344.040" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on October 8, 2009. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:352". Archived from the initial on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:312". Archived from the initial on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:311". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Title 5, Chapter 337: HUMAN RIGHTS ACT". www.mainelegislature.org. Archived from the initial on February 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Annotated Code of Maryland 49B.16". Archived from the original on September 29, 2011. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "M.G.L. 151B § 4". Archived from the initial on July 7, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "M.G.L 151B § 1". Archived from the original on June 4, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on December 26, 2014. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Minnesota Statutes, area 363A.08". Archived from the original on September 6, 2015. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 213.055 R.S.Mo". Archived from the initial on May 23, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Montana Code Annotated 49-2-303". Archived from the initial on September 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Nebraska Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the initial on November 26, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "NRS: CHAPTER 613 - EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES". www.leg.state.nv.us. Archived from the initial on December 24, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Section 354-A:7 Unlawful Discriminatory Practices". Archived from the initial on January 2, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (N.J.S.A. 10:5 -12)". ^ a b c "2006 New Mexico Statutes - Section 28-1-7 - Unlawful prejudiced practice". Justia Law. Archived from the original on September 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "New york city State Executive Law, Article 15, Section 296". Archived from the initial on October 4, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "New york city Labor Law Section 201-D - Discrimination against the engagement in specific activities. - New York City Attorney Resources - New York City Laws". law.onecle.com. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "North Dakota Human Rights Act" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 18, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "2006 Ohio Revised Code -:: 4112. Civil Rights Commission". Justia Law. Archived from the original on March 9, 2016. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Oklahoma Attorney General Of The United States|". www.oag.ok.gov. Archived from the original on December 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 659A". Archived from the original on August 16, 2023. Retrieved October 17, 2019. ^ "Laws Administered by the Pennsylvania Human Rights Commission" (PDF). [irreversible dead link] ^ "State of Rhode Island General Assembly". www.rilegislature.gov. Archived from the initial on October 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "South Carolina Human Affairs Law". Archived from the original on May 6, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "Tennessee State Government - TN.gov". www.tn.gov. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 21. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the original on September 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Utah Code 34A-5-106". Archived from the original on July 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Vermont Fair Employment Practices Act" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "Virginia Human Rights Act". Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "RCW 49.60.180: Unfair practices of employers". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on November 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.60.172: Unfair practices with respect to HIV or hepatitis C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.60.174: Evaluation of claim of discrimination-Actual or viewed HIV or hepatitis C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.44.090: Unfair practices in work due to the fact that of age of staff member or applicant-Exceptions". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "State of West Virginia" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "Wisconsin Statutes Tabulation". docs.legis.wisconsin.gov. Archived from the initial on November 3, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ Wyoming Code 27-9-105 [irreversible dead link] ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 3" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009. ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 5" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009. ^ a b "Puerto Rico Laws 29-I-7-146". Archived from the initial on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Puerto Rico Laws PR 29-I-7-151". Archived from the initial on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Virgin Islands Code on § 451". Archived from the original on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 22. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION FOR PARTICIPATING IN EMERGENCY EVACUATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the initial on June 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Addressing Sexual Preference Discrimination In Federal Civilian Employment: A Guide to Employee's Rights". Archived from the original on January 14, 2007. ^ Rutenberg, Jim (June 24, 2009). "New Protections for Transgender Federal Workers (Published 2009)". The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. ^ a b "Federal Employee Speech & the First Amendment|ACLU of DC". www.acludc.org. November 9, 2017. Archived from the initial on September 21, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Justice Department Announces Findings of Two Civil Rights Investigations in Ferguson, Missouri". www.justice.gov. March 4, 2015. Archived from the original on August 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b c "When is it legal for a company to discriminate in their employing practices based upon a Bona Fide Occupation Qualification?". University of Cincinnati Law Review Blog. April 27, 2016. Archived from the initial on April 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b c "CM-625 Bona Fide Occupational Qualifications". US EEOC. January 2, 1982. Archived from the initial on December 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b "United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, 499 U.S. 187 (1991 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977 )". Justia Law. Archived from the original on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Religious Discrimination - Workplace Fairness". www.workplacefairness.org. Archived from the initial on November 12, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Questions and Answers about Religious Discrimination in the Workplace". www.eeoc.gov. January 31, 2011. Archived from the original on March 5, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Sincerely Held or Suddenly Held Religious Exemptions to Vaccination?". www.americanbar.org. Archived from the initial on December 19, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ Thom Patterson (November 10, 2016). "Prepare for more US females in battle". CNN. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ http://www.militaryaerospace.com/blogs/mil-aero-blog/2012/12/conspicuous-gallantry-doris-miller-at-pearl-harbor-was-one-of-world-war-ii-s-first-heroes.html Archived May 30, 2023, at the Wayback Machine [1] ^ Gates, Henry Louis; Root, Jr|Originally published on The (January 14, 2013). "Segregation in the Armed Forces During World War II|African American History Blog". The African Americans: Many Rivers to Cross. Archived from the initial on June 21, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ a b "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the original on December 11, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b "Personnel Adm'r of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256 (1979 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and viewpoints". Findlaw. Archived from the original on August 25, 2019. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Shaping Employment Discrimination Law". Archived from the initial on May 11, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "Federal Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Laws". Archived from the original on August 6, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "Pre 1965: Events Causing the Creation of EEOC". Archived from the initial on August 26, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 2000e-5 - Enforcement arrangements". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the initial on November 1, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "PART 1614-- FEDERAL SECTOR EQUAL JOB OPPORTUNITY". Archived from the original on July 27, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ a b "Filing a Charge of Employment Discrimination". Archived from the initial on August 12, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 503". Archived from the original on August 2, 2009. Retrieved August 1, 2009. ^ "A Summary of the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices". Archived from the initial on May 31, 2009. Retrieved July 30, 2009. External links

Directory of state labor departments, from the U.S. Department of Labor Disability Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Sex-Based Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Your Rights At Work (Connecticut).

• Barnes, Patricia G., (2014 ), Betrayed: The Legalization of Age Discrimination in the Workplace. The author, an attorney and judge, argues that the U.S. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 stops working to protect older workers. Weak to begin with, she mentions that the ADEA has actually been eviscerated by the U.S. Supreme Court.
• Tweedy, Ann E. and Karen Yescavage, Employment Discrimination Against Bisexuals: An Empirical Study, 21 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L.