GitLab

Employment discrimination law in the United States originates from the common law, and is codified in various state, federal, and regional laws. These laws prohibit discrimination based on particular characteristics or "protected classifications". The United States Constitution likewise restricts discrimination by federal and state governments against their public employees. Discrimination in the personal sector is not straight constrained by the Constitution, but has ended up being based on a growing body of federal and state law, consisting of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Federal law forbids discrimination in a variety of areas, consisting of recruiting, employing, job assessments, promo policies, training, compensation and disciplinary action. State laws typically extend defense to additional categories or companies.

Under federal work discrimination law, companies usually can not victimize workers on the basis of race, [1] sex [1] [2] (including sexual orientation and gender identity), [3] pregnancy, [4] religious beliefs, [1] nationwide origin, [1] disability (physical or psychological, including status), [5] [6] age (for workers over 40), [7] military service or affiliation, [8] bankruptcy or bad financial obligations, [9] hereditary info, [10] and citizenship status (for residents, irreversible homeowners, short-lived citizens, refugees, and asylees). [11]
List of United States federal discrimination law

Equal Pay Act of 1963 Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964
Title IX


Constitutional basis

The United States Constitution does not directly address employment discrimination, however its prohibitions on discrimination by the federal government have been held to safeguard federal government employees.

The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution restrict the power of the federal and state governments to discriminate. The Fifth Amendment has a specific requirement that the federal government does not deprive individuals of "life, liberty, or home", without due procedure of the law. It likewise consists of an implicit warranty that the Fourteenth Amendment clearly restricts states from violating a person's rights of due process and equal defense. In the employment context, these Constitutional arrangements would limit the right of the state and federal governments to discriminate in their work practices by dealing with employees, former workers, or job applicants unequally due to the fact that of membership in a group (such as a race or sex). Due procedure defense needs that civil servant have a reasonable procedural procedure before they are ended if the termination is connected to a "liberty" (such as the right to totally free speech) or residential or commercial property interest. As both Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses are passive, the clause that empowers Congress to pass anti-discrimination expenses (so they are not unconstitutional under Tenth Amendment) is Section 5 of Fourteenth Amendment.

Employment discrimination or harassment in the personal sector is not unconstitutional because Federal and most State Constitutions do not specifically provide their particular federal government the power to enact civil rights laws that use to the personal sector. The Federal government's authority to control a private service, consisting of civil liberties laws, comes from their power to regulate all commerce in between the States. Some State Constitutions do expressly manage some defense from public and private work discrimination, such as Article I of the California Constitution. However, most State Constitutions just resolve inequitable treatment by the federal government, consisting of a public company.

Absent of a provision in a State Constitution, State civil liberties laws that regulate the personal sector are typically Constitutional under the "authorities powers" doctrine or the power of a State to enact laws designed to secure public health, safety and morals. All States must comply with the Federal Civil liberty laws, but States might enact civil liberties laws that offer additional employment defense.

For instance, some State civil rights laws provide security from employment discrimination on the basis of political association, despite the fact that such kinds of discrimination are not yet covered in federal civil rights laws.

History of federal laws

Federal law governing employment discrimination has actually developed gradually.

The Equal Pay Act modified the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1963. It is implemented by the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor. [12] The Equal Pay Act prohibits employers and unions from paying various earnings based on sex. It does not prohibit other inequitable practices in employing. It provides that where workers carry out equal operate in the corner needing "equal skill, effort, and obligation and performed under similar working conditions," they need to be offered equal pay. [2] The Fair Labor Standards Act uses to employers taken part in some aspect of interstate commerce, or all of an employer's employees if the enterprise is engaged as a whole in a considerable quantity of interstate commerce. [citation needed]
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 forbids discrimination in numerous more elements of the work relationship. "Title VII produced the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to administer the act". [12] It applies to most employers participated in interstate commerce with more than 15 staff members, labor organizations, and employment agencies. Title VII prohibits discrimination based upon race, historydb.date color, religious beliefs, sex or national origin. It makes it illegal for companies to discriminate based upon safeguarded qualities relating to terms, conditions, and privileges of work. Employment firms may not discriminate when working with or referring applicants, and labor companies are also prohibited from basing membership or union classifications on race, color, faith, sex, or nationwide origin. [1] The Pregnancy Discrimination Act changed Title VII in 1978, defining that illegal sex discrimination includes discrimination based on pregnancy, childbirth, and associated medical conditions. [4] A related statute, the Family and Medical Leave Act, sets requirements governing leave for pregnancy and pregnancy-related conditions. [13]
Executive Order 11246 in 1965 "restricts discrimination by federal contractors and subcontractors on account of race, color, religious beliefs, sex, or national origin [and] requires affirmative action by federal professionals". [14]
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), enacted in 1968 and amended in 1978 and 1986, forbids employers from discriminating on the basis of age. The restricted practices are nearly identical to those described in Title VII, other than that the ADEA protects workers in companies with 20 or more workers rather than 15 or more. A worker is secured from discrimination based upon age if he or she is over 40. Since 1978, the ADEA has actually phased out and restricted necessary retirement, except for high-powered decision-making positions (that also provide big pensions). The ADEA includes specific standards for benefit, pension and timeoftheworld.date retirement plans. [7] Though ADEA is the center of the majority of discussion of age discrimination legislation, there is a longer history beginning with the abolishment of "optimal ages of entry into work in 1956" by the United States Civil Service Commission. Then in 1964, Executive Order 11141 "established a policy versus age discrimination among federal professionals". [15]
The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 forbids work discrimination on the basis of disability by the federal government, federal professionals with contracts of more than $10,000, and wakewiki.de programs receiving federal financial assistance. [16] It requires affirmative action in addition to non-discrimination. [16] Section 504 requires reasonable lodging, and Section 508 requires that electronic and details innovation be accessible to handicapped workers. [16]
The Black Lung Benefits Act of 1972 restricts discrimination by mine operators against miners who struggle with "black lung disease" (pneumoconiosis). [17]
The Vietnam Era Readjustment Act of 1974 "requires affirmative action for disabled and Vietnam era veterans by federal professionals". [14]
The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of bankruptcy or uncollectable bills. [9]
The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 restricts companies with more than three workers from victimizing anybody (other than an unapproved immigrant) on the basis of national origin or citizenship status. [18]
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) was enacted to get rid of inequitable barriers versus certified people with disabilities, individuals with a record of an impairment, or individuals who are related to as having a special needs. It forbids discrimination based on genuine or perceived physical or psychological impairments. It likewise requires employers to supply sensible accommodations to staff members who require them since of a disability to obtain a job, perform the essential functions of a job, or delight in the benefits and benefits of employment, unless the employer can reveal that undue difficulty will result. There are stringent limitations on when an employer can ask disability-related concerns or require medical examinations, and all medical information must be treated as private. A special needs is defined under the ADA as a psychological or physical health condition that "considerably limits one or more major life activities. " [5]
The Nineteenth Century Civil Liberty Acts, changed in 1993, guarantee all persons equal rights under the law and outline the damages available to plaintiffs in actions brought under Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the 1973 Rehabilitation Act. [19] [20]
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 bars companies from using people' hereditary details when making hiring, firing, job placement, or promotion choices. [10]
The proposed US Equality Act of 2015 would prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual preference or gender identity. [21] As of June 2018 [update], 28 US states do not clearly include sexual preference and 29 US states do not explicitly include gender identity within anti-discrimination statutes.

LGBT work discrimination

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 forbids work discrimination on the basis of sexual preference or gender identity. This is included by the law's restriction of work discrimination on the basis of sex. Prior to the landmark cases Bostock v. Clayton County and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2020 ), work protections for LGBT individuals were patchwork; several states and localities explicitly restrict harassment and predisposition in work choices on the basis of sexual orientation and/or gender identity, although some only cover public employees. [22] Prior to the Bostock choice, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) analyzed Title VII to cover LGBT workers; the EEOC's figured out that transgender workers were safeguarded under Title VII in 2012, [23] and extended the security to incorporate sexual orientation in 2015. [24] [25]
According to Crosby Burns and Jeff Krehely: "Studies reveal that anywhere from 15 percent to 43 percent of gay people have actually experienced some kind of discrimination and harassment at the workplace. Moreover, an incredible 90 percent of transgender employees report some form of harassment or mistreatment on the job." Lots of people in the LGBT community have lost their task, consisting of Vandy Beth Glenn, a transgender female who claims that her manager told her that her presence may make other individuals feel uncomfortable. [26]
Almost half of the United States likewise have state-level or municipal-level laws prohibiting the discrimination of gender non-conforming and transgender people in both public and personal work environments. A couple of more states ban LGBT discrimination in only public offices. [27] Some opponents of these laws think that it would intrude on spiritual liberty, even though these laws are focused more on prejudiced actions, not beliefs. Courts have also determined that these laws do not infringe free speech or religious liberty. [28]
State law

State statutes also offer extensive defense from employment discrimination. Some laws extend similar security as offered by the federal acts to employers who are not covered by those statutes. Other statutes supply protection to groups not covered by the federal acts. Some state laws provide greater security to staff members of the state or of state contractors.

The following table lists classifications not safeguarded by federal law. Age is included also, since federal law only covers employees over 40.

In addition,

- District of Columbia - admission, personal look [35]- Michigan - height, weight [53]- Texas - Participation in emergency situation evacuation order [90]- Vermont - Birthplace [76]
Government employees

Title VII likewise uses to state, federal, regional and other public workers. Employees of federal and state governments have extra securities against work discrimination.

The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 prohibits discrimination in federal employment on the basis of conduct that does not impact task efficiency. The Office of Personnel Management has actually interpreted this as prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual preference. [91] In June 2009, it was announced that the interpretation would be broadened to consist of gender identity. [92]
Additionally, public staff members keep their First Amendment rights, whereas private employers can limitations workers' speech in certain methods. [93] Public workers retain their First Amendment rights insofar as they are speaking as a personal citizen (not on behalf of their employer), they are speaking on a matter of public concern, and their speech is not interfering with their task. [93]
Federal staff members who have employment discrimination claims, such as postal employees of the United States Postal Service (USPS) must sue in the proper federal jurisdiction, which positions a different set of issues for plaintiffs.

Exceptions

Authentic occupational credentials

Employers are usually enabled to think about qualities that would otherwise be discriminatory if they are authentic occupational credentials (BFOQ). The most common BFOQ is sex, and the 2nd most typical BFOQ is age. Bona Fide Occupational Qualifications can not be utilized for discrimination on the basis of race.

The only exception to this rule is shown in a single case, Wittmer v. Peters, where the court rules that law enforcement security can match races when needed. For instance, if cops are running operations that involve private informants, ura.cc or undercover representatives, sending out an African American officer into a sting for a KKK white supremacy group. Additionally, authorities departments, such as the department in Ferguson, Missouri, can consider race-based policing and work with officers that are proportional to the community's racial makeup. [94]
BFOQs do not use in the show business, such as casting for films and television. [95] Directors, manufacturers and casting staff are enabled to cast characters based on physical qualities, such as race, sex, hair color, eye color, weight, etc. Employment discrimination claims for Disparate Treatment are rare in the home entertainment market, particularly in performers. [95] This validation is special to the show business, and does not transfer to other industries, such as retail or food. [95]
Often, employers will use BFOQ as a defense to a Disparate Treatment theory employment discrimination. BFOQ can not be an expense reason in wage spaces in between different groups of staff members. [96] Cost can be thought about when a company should stabilize privacy and safety concerns with the number of positions that a company are attempting to fill. [96]
Additionally, customer choice alone can not be a validation unless there is a personal privacy or safety defense. [96] For example, retail establishments in rural locations can not restrict African American clerks based on the racial ideologies of the customer base. But, matching genders for staffing at centers that deal with kids survivors of sexual abuse is permitted.

If an employer were trying to show that work discrimination was based on a BFOQ, there must be a factual basis for believing that all or substantially all members of a class would be not able to perform the task safely and efficiently or that it is not practical to figure out credentials on a personalized basis. [97] Additionally, lack of a malicious motive does not convert a facially inequitable policy into a neutral policy with a discriminatory result. [97] Employers likewise carry the burden to show that a BFOQ is fairly required, and a lesser discriminatory alternative technique does not exist. [98]
Religious employment discrimination

"Religious discrimination is treating people differently in their employment because of their religion, their religious beliefs and practices, and/or their request for accommodation (a modification in an office rule or policy) of their faiths and practices. It also consists of dealing with people differently in their employment because of their lack of religious belief or practice" (Workplace Fairness). [99] According to The U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission, employers are prohibited from declining to work with an individual based on their religion- alike race, sex, age, and disability. If a staff member believes that they have experienced spiritual discrimination, they need to resolve this to the alleged transgressor. On the other hand, staff members are safeguarded by the law for reporting job discrimination and have the ability to file charges with the EEOC. [100] Some areas in the U.S. now have provisions that ban discrimination versus atheists. The courts and laws of the United States provide specific exemptions in these laws to businesses or organizations that are religious or religiously-affiliated, however, to differing degrees in different areas, depending upon the setting and the context; a few of these have actually been maintained and others reversed in time.

The most current and pervasive example of Religious Discrimination is the extensive rejection of the COVID-19 Vaccine. Many employees are using religions against modifying the body and preventative medicine as a reason to not receive the vaccination. Companies that do not allow workers to obtain religious exemptions, or decline their application might be charged by the worker with work discrimination on the basis of faiths. However, there are certain requirements for staff members to present proof that it is a truly held belief. [101]
Members of the Communist Party

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 explicitly permits discrimination against members of the Communist Party.

Military

The military has faced criticism for forbiding ladies from serving in fight roles. In 2016, however, the law was modified to enable them to serve. [102] [103] [104] In the article posted on the PBS website, Henry Louis Gates Jr. writes about the method which black males were dealt with in the military throughout the 1940s. According to Gates, throughout that time the whites offered the African Americans an opportunity to show themselves as Americans by having them participate in the war. The National Geographic site states, nevertheless, that when black soldiers signed up with the Navy, they were only permitted to work as servants; their involvement was restricted to the roles of mess attendants, stewards, and cooks. Even when African Americans wished to defend the country they lived in, they were rejected the power to do so.

The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) safeguards the job rights of individuals who willingly or involuntarily leave employment positions to undertake military service or certain kinds of service in the National Disaster Medical System. [105] The law likewise restricts companies from victimizing staff members for past or present participation or membership in the uniformed services. [105] Policies that offer choice to veterans versus non-veterans has actually been declared to enforce systemic diverse treatment of women because there is a vast underrepresentation of women in the uniformed services. [106] The court has actually declined this claim because there was no inequitable intent towards females in this veteran friendly policy. [106]
Unintentional discrimination

Employment practices that do not straight discriminate against a protected classification may still be unlawful if they produce a disparate impact on members of a protected group. Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 forbids work practices that have a discriminatory impact, unless they relate to job performance.

The Act needs the elimination of artificial, approximate, and unnecessary barriers to work that operate invidiously to discriminate on the basis of race, and, if, as here, a work practice that runs to omit Negroes can not be shown to be related to job efficiency, it is forbidden, regardless of the employer's absence of inequitable intent. [107]
Height and weight requirements have been recognized by the EEOC as having a disparate influence on national origin minorities. [108]
When resisting a diverse impact claim that alleges age discrimination, an employer, nevertheless, does not need to show necessity; rather, it needs to just show that its practice is affordable. [citation needed]
Enforcing entities

The Equal Job Opportunity Commission (EEOC) analyzes and implements the Equal Pay Act, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title I and V of the Americans With Disabilities Act, Sections 501 and 505 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Civil Rights Act of 1991. [109] The Commission was established by the Civil liberty Act of 1964. [110] Its enforcement provisions are included in section 2000e-5 of Title 42, [111] and its regulations and standards are contained in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 1614. [112] Persons wanting to submit fit under Title VII and/or the ADA must exhaust their administrative treatments by submitting an administrative grievance with the EEOC prior to submitting their claim in court. [113]
The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs enforces Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act, which prohibits discrimination against certified people with disabilities by federal contractors and subcontractors. [114]
Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, each company has and enforces its own guidelines that use to its own programs and to any entities that get financial help. [16]
The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) imposes the anti-discrimination provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1324b, which restricts discrimination based upon citizenship status or national origin. [115]
State Fair Employment Practices (FEP) workplaces take the function of the EEOC in administering state statutes. [113]
Employment Non-Discrimination Act LGBT employment discrimination in the United States Employment discrimination against persons with criminal records in the United States Racial wage space in the United States Gender pay space in the United States Criticism of credit scoring systems in the United States
References

^ a b c d e "Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964". US EEOC. Archived from the original on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "The Equal Pay Act of 1963". Archived from the initial on April 5, 2020. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. ___ (2020 ). ^ a b "Pregnancy Discrimination Act". Archived from the original on May 12, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ a b "Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, As Amended". ADA.gov. Archived from the original on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Questions and Answers: The Americans with Disabilities Act and Persons with HIV/AIDS". Archived from the original on July 22, 2009. Retrieved July 21, 2009. ^ a b "The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967". Archived from the initial on December 13, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the original on December 11, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b 11 U.S.C. § 525 ^ a b "Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008" (PDF). gpo.gov. May 21, 2008. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 6, 2018. Retrieved January 6, 2015. ^ 8 U.S.C. § 1324b ^ a b Blankenship, Kim M (1993 ). "Bringing Gender and Race in: U.S. Employment Discrimination Policy". Gender and Society. 7 (2 ): 204-226. doi:10.1177/ 089124393007002004. JSTOR 189578. S2CID 144175260. ^ "Family and Medical Leave Act". Archived from the original on June 18, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ a b Rozmarin, George C (1980 ). "Employment Discrimination Laws and Their Application". Law Notes for the General Practitioner. 16 (1 ): 25-29. JSTOR 44066330. ^ Neumark, D (2003 ). "Age discrimination legislations in the United States" (PDF). Contemporary Economic Policy. 21 (3 ): 297-317. doi:10.1093/ cep/byg012. S2CID 38171380. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 2, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "Guide to Disability Rights Laws". ADA.gov. December 20, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "30 USC Sec. 938". Archived from the initial on June 7, 2011. Retrieved July 21, 2009. ^ "Summary of Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986". Archived from the initial on May 6, 2013. Retrieved August 14, 2021. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981 - Equal rights under the law". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on December 16, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981a - Damages in cases of intentional discrimination in work". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on November 27, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA)". Archived from the initial on June 17, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ Tilcsik, András (January 1, 2011). "Pride and Prejudice: Employment Discrimination against Openly Gay Men in the United States". American Journal of Sociology. 117 (2 ): 586-626. doi:10.1086/ 661653. hdl:1807/ 34998. JSTOR 10.1086/ 661653. PMID 22268247. S2CID 23542996. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "In Landmark Ruling, Feds Add Transgendered to Anti-Discrimination Law:: EDGE Boston, MA". Edgeboston.com. April 25, 2012. Archived from the original on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Carpenter, Dale (December 14, 2012). "Anti-gay discrimination is sex discrimination, states the EEOC". The Washington Post. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Tatectate, Curtis. "EEOC: Federal law bans work environment bias versus gays, lesbians, bisexuals|Miami Herald Miami Herald". Miamiherald.com. Archived from the initial on April 28, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Burns, Crosby; Krehely, Jeff (June 2, 2011). "Gay and Transgender People Face High Rates of Workplace Discrimination and Harassment". Center for American Progress. Archived from the initial on November 26, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ "Sexual Orientation Discrimination in the Workplace". FindLaw. Archived from the original on May 7, 2021. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ Lowndes, Coleman; Maza, Carlos (September 23, 2014). "The Top Five Myths About LGBT Non-Discrimination Laws Debunked". Media Matters for America. Archived from the initial on June 17, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ "Code of Alabama 25-1-21". Archived from the initial on July 23, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b c "Alaska Statutes: AS 18.80.220. Unlawful Employment Practices; Exception". touchngo.com. Archived from the original on December 6, 2022. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d e f "Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA)". California Department of Fair Employment and Housing. CA.gov. 2010. Archived from the original on September 9, 2016. Retrieved September 9, 2016. ^ a b "Colorado Civil Rights Division 2008 Statutes" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on May 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Chapter 814c Sec. 46a-60". Archived from the initial on October 17, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Delaware Code Online". delcode.delaware.gov. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d e "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Prohibited Acts of Discrimination" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 23, 2009. Retrieved August 8, 2019. ^ "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Table of Contents, General Provisions" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 30, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Statutes & Constitution: View Statutes:-> 2008-> Ch0760-> Section 10: Online Sunshine". www.leg.state.fl.us. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Georgia Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the original on January 29, 2010. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Hawaii Rev Statutes 378-2". Archived from the original on August 14, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Idaho Commission on Human Rights: Age Discrimination"". Archived from the original on February 21, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Illinois Human Rights Act". Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Indiana General Assembly". iga.in.gov. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Iowa Code 216.6". Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Kansas Age Discrimination in Employment Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on October 6, 2008. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Kentucky Revised Statutes 344.040" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on October 8, 2009. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:352". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:312". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:311". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Title 5, Chapter 337: HUMAN RIGHTS ACT". www.mainelegislature.org. Archived from the initial on February 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Annotated Code of Maryland 49B.16". Archived from the original on September 29, 2011. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "M.G.L. 151B § 4". Archived from the original on July 7, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "M.G.L 151B § 1". Archived from the initial on June 4, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on December 26, 2014. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Minnesota Statutes, section 363A.08". Archived from the initial on September 6, 2015. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 213.055 R.S.Mo". Archived from the initial on May 23, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Montana Code Annotated 49-2-303". Archived from the initial on September 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Nebraska Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the initial on November 26, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "NRS: clashofcryptos.trade CHAPTER 613 - EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES". www.leg.state.nv.us. Archived from the initial on December 24, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Section 354-A:7 Unlawful Discriminatory Practices". Archived from the original on January 2, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (N.J.S.A. 10:5 -12)". ^ a b c "2006 New Mexico Statutes - Section 28-1-7 - Unlawful inequitable practice". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on September 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "New york city State Executive Law, Article 15, Section 296". Archived from the original on October 4, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "New York Labor Law Section 201-D - Discrimination versus the engagement in certain activities. - New York Attorney Resources - New York City Laws". law.onecle.com. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "North Dakota Human Rights Act" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 18, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "2006 Ohio Revised Code -:: 4112. Civil Rights Commission". Justia Law. Archived from the original on March 9, 2016. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Oklahoma Attorney General|". www.oag.ok.gov. Archived from the original on December 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 659A". Archived from the initial on August 16, 2023. Retrieved October 17, 2019. ^ "Laws Administered by the Pennsylvania Human Rights Commission" (PDF). [permanent dead link] ^ "State of Rhode Island General Assembly". www.rilegislature.gov. Archived from the original on October 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "South Carolina Human Affairs Law". Archived from the initial on May 6, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "Tennessee State Government - TN.gov". www.tn.gov. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 21. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the initial on September 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Utah Code 34A-5-106". Archived from the original on July 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Vermont Fair Employment Practices Act" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on June 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "Virginia Human Rights Act". Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "RCW 49.60.180: Unfair practices of companies". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on November 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.60.172: Unfair practices with regard to HIV or hepatitis C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.60.174: Evaluation of claim of discrimination-Actual or perceived HIV or liver disease C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.44.090: Unfair practices in employment because of age of worker or applicant-Exceptions". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "State of West Virginia" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "Wisconsin Statutes Tabulation". docs.legis.wisconsin.gov. Archived from the original on November 3, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ Wyoming Code 27-9-105 [irreversible dead link] ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 3" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009. ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 5" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009. ^ a b "Puerto Rico Laws 29-I-7-146". Archived from the original on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Puerto Rico Laws PR 29-I-7-151". Archived from the original on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Virgin Islands Code on Employment Discrimination § 451". Archived from the initial on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 22. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION FOR TAKING PART IN EMERGENCY EVACUATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the original on June 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Addressing Sexual Orientation Discrimination In Federal Civilian Employment: A Guide to Employee's Rights". Archived from the initial on January 14, 2007. ^ Rutenberg, Jim (June 24, 2009). "New Protections for Transgender Federal Workers (Published 2009)". The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. ^ a b "Federal Employee Speech & the First Amendment|ACLU of DC". www.acludc.org. November 9, 2017. Archived from the initial on September 21, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Justice Department of Two Civil Rights Investigations in Ferguson, Missouri". www.justice.gov. March 4, 2015. Archived from the initial on August 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b c "When is it legal for an employer to discriminate in their employing practices based on a Bona Fide Occupation Qualification?". University of Cincinnati Law Review Blog. April 27, 2016. Archived from the initial on April 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b c "CM-625 Bona Fide Occupational Qualifications". US EEOC. January 2, 1982. Archived from the original on December 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b "United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, 499 U.S. 187 (1991 )". Justia Law. Archived from the original on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977 )". Justia Law. Archived from the original on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Religious Discrimination - Workplace Fairness". www.workplacefairness.org. Archived from the initial on November 12, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Questions and Answers about Religious Discrimination in the Workplace". www.eeoc.gov. January 31, 2011. Archived from the initial on March 5, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Sincerely Held or forum.altaycoins.com Suddenly Held Religious Exemptions to Vaccination?". www.americanbar.org. Archived from the initial on December 19, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ Thom Patterson (November 10, 2016). "Prepare for more US females in combat". CNN. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ http://www.militaryaerospace.com/blogs/mil-aero-blog/2012/12/conspicuous-gallantry-doris-miller-at-pearl-harbor-was-one-of-world-war-ii-s-first-heroes.html Archived May 30, 2023, at the Wayback Machine [1] ^ Gates, Henry Louis; Root, Jr|Originally published on The (January 14, 2013). "Segregation in the Army During World War II|African American History Blog". The African Americans: Many Rivers to Cross. Archived from the initial on June 21, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ a b "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the original on December 11, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b "Personnel Adm'r of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256 (1979 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and viewpoints". Findlaw. Archived from the initial on August 25, 2019. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Shaping Employment Discrimination Law". Archived from the original on May 11, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "Federal Equal Job Opportunity (EEO) Laws". Archived from the initial on August 6, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "Pre 1965: Events Resulting In the Creation of EEOC". Archived from the initial on August 26, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 2000e-5 - Enforcement arrangements". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the initial on November 1, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "PART 1614-- FEDERAL SECTOR EQUAL JOB OPPORTUNITY". Archived from the initial on July 27, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ a b "Filing a Charge of Employment Discrimination". Archived from the initial on August 12, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 503". Archived from the initial on August 2, 2009. Retrieved August 1, 2009. ^ "An Overview of the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices". Archived from the original on May 31, 2009. Retrieved July 30, 2009. External links

Directory of state labor departments, from the U.S. Department of Labor Disability Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission Sex-Based Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission Your Rights At Work (Connecticut).

• Barnes, Patricia G., (2014 ), Betrayed: The Legalization of Age Discrimination in the Workplace. The author, a lawyer and judge, argues that the U.S. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 fails to secure older workers. Weak to begin with, she mentions that the ADEA has been eviscerated by the U.S. Supreme Court.
• Tweedy, Ann E. and Karen Yescavage, Employment Discrimination Against Bisexuals: An Empirical Study, 21 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L.