GitLab

One Australian company has dissuaded personnel from using the innovation, others are scrambling for advice on its cybersecurity ramifications - while federal government ministers are advising caution.

But others have actually welcomed DeepSeek's arrival, calling for Australia to follow China's lead in establishing powerful yet less energy-intensive AI technology.

In the days considering that the Chinese company introduced its R1 expert system model and openly launched its chatbot and app, it has upended the AI industry.

- Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email

Several international market leaders saw their market values drop after the launch, as DeepSeek showed AI might be developed utilizing a fraction of the expense and processing required to train designs such as ChatGPT or Meta's Llama.

Its arrival might signal a new industry shift, but for federal government and company, the effect is unclear. Whereas ChatGPT's 2022 arrival caught federal governments and organizations by surprise as personnel began to try the brand-new AI innovation, at least for historydb.date the arrival of Deepseek, some had a playbook.

Business as usual

A for Telstra said the business had "a strenuous procedure to assess all AI tools, capabilities, and utilize cases in our service", including a list of authorized generative AI tools, and standards on how to use them.

For now at Telstra, DeepSeek is not authorized and its use is not motivated (although it's not formally blocked).

"Our preferred partner is MS Copilot, and we're rolling out 21,000 Copilot for Microsoft 365 licences to our employees."

Other business looked for instant suggestions on whether DeepSeek ought to be embraced.

Major Australian cybersecurity company CyberCX's executive director of cyber intelligence, Katherine Mansted, securityholes.science said clients had already approached the company for suggestions on whether the innovation was safe.

"That's not a surprise, since it appears the entire world has actually remained in a little bit of a DeepSeek craze - both the financially and market likely and those with the security lens," Mansted said.

DeepSeek and government

CyberCX today took the unusual action of rapidly providing suggestions suggesting organisations, consisting of government departments and those saving sensitive details, strongly consider restricting access to DeepSeek on work devices.

"We know that there is no proactive policy here from federal government ... We've been down this roadway before," Mansted stated. "We've had disputes about TikTok, about Chinese monitoring video cameras, about Huawei in the telco network, and we always act after the reality, not before the fact ... Here, particularly because the dangers are around compromise of delicate details, in regards to any information that you put into this AI assistant: it's going straight to China.

"We believed we required to act quicker this time."

Under federal AI policy carried out in September 2024, companies have till the end of February 2025 to release transparency documents about their use of AI.

But understanding who makes decisions on the specific use of DeepSeek in the federal government has shown difficult. The attorney general of the United States's department, which made the choice to prohibit TikTok use on federal government gadgets, referred inquiries to the Digital Transformation Agency, which in turn referred enquires to the Department of Home Affairs.

Home Affairs was asked on Thursday for its official policy and did not provide a reaction by the time of publication.

Familiar debates ...

A few of the response in Australia to DeepSeek is by now familiar. There have been calls to prohibit the technology, amidst concern over how the Chinese federal government may access user information - an echo of the days Huawei was prohibited from the NBN and 5G rollouts in Australia, and more just recently, of the debate over banning TikTok.

The Australian Strategic Policy Institute, a strong critic of the China government, stated today that Australia "can not continue the present technique of reacting to each new tech development". It required a tech method covering AI that consisted of investing in sovereign AI abilities.

The industry minister, Ed Husic, said on Tuesday it was prematurely to make a decision on whether DeepSeek was a security danger.

Sign up to Breaking News Australia

Get the most important news as it breaks

"If there is anything that presents a risk in the nationwide interest, we will always keep an open mind and watch what occurs. I think it's prematurely to leap to conclusions on that," he stated. "But, again, historydb.date if we need to act, then responsible federal governments do."

He worried that Australia is "in the lasts" of planning its reaction and would establish its own regulative settings.

"The US is flagging their method. The EU has theirs. Canada likewise will have a various technique. And our regional partners as well are looking at this," he said.