GitLab

While the banking market is widely seen as more durable today than it was heading into the financial crisis of 2007-2009,1 the commercial property (CRE) landscape has altered considerably considering that the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. This new landscape, one defined by a higher rate of interest environment and hybrid work, will affect CRE market conditions. Given that neighborhood and regional banks tend to have higher CRE concentrations than big companies (Figure 1), smaller banks ought to stay abreast of existing trends, emerging risk factors, and chances to improve CRE concentration threat management.2,3

Several recent market forums conducted by the Federal Reserve System and specific Reserve Banks have actually touched on numerous aspects of CRE. This short article aims to aggregate key takeaways from these different forums, as well as from our recent supervisory experiences, and to share notable patterns in the CRE market and appropriate risk aspects. Further, this short article resolves the significance of proactively handling concentration danger in a highly dynamic credit environment and provides several finest practices that illustrate how risk supervisors can think about Supervision and Regulation (SR) letter 07-1, "Interagency Guidance on Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate," 4 in today's landscape.

Market Conditions and Trends

Context

Let's put all of this into point of view. As of December 31, 2022, 31 percent of the insured depository institutions reported a concentration in CRE loans.5 The majority of these banks were community and regional banks, making them an important funding source for CRE credit.6 This figure is lower than it was throughout the monetary crisis of 2007-2009, however it has actually been increasing over the previous year (the November 2022 Supervision and Regulation Report specified that it was 28 percent on June 30, 2022). Throughout 2022, CRE performance metrics held up well, and loaning activity stayed robust. However, there were signs of credit deterioration, as CRE loans 30-89 days past due increased year over year for CRE-concentrated banks (Figure 2). That said, overdue metrics are lagging indications of a debtor's monetary challenge. Therefore, it is critical for banks to implement and preserve proactive danger management practices - talked about in more detail later in this post - that can alert bank management to deteriorating performance.

Noteworthy Trends

Most of the buzz in the CRE area coming out of the pandemic has been around the office sector, and for good factor. A current study from service professors at Columbia University and New york city University found that the worth of U.S. workplace buildings might plunge 39 percent, or $454 billion, in the coming years.7 This may be triggered by current patterns, such as tenants not renewing their leases as employees go fully remote or renters restoring their leases for less space. In some extreme examples, business are providing up area that they leased only months earlier - a clear sign of how quickly the market can kip down some locations. The battle to fill empty workplace area is a nationwide trend. The national job rate is at a record 19.1 percent - Chicago, Houston, and San Francisco are all above 20 percent - and the amount of workplace area leased in the United States in the third quarter of 2022 was almost a third listed below the quarterly average for 2018 and 2019.

Despite record vacancies, banks have actually benefited hence far from workplace loans supported by lengthy leases that insulate them from unexpected degeneration in their portfolios. Recently, some big banks have actually begun to sell their workplace loans to limit their exposure.8 The large amount of workplace debt growing in the next one to three years might produce maturity and re-finance risks for banks, depending upon the monetary stability and health of their customers.9

In addition to recent actions taken by large firms, patterns in the CRE bond market are another essential indicator of market belief related to CRE and, particularly, to the workplace sector. For example, the stock prices of large publicly traded proprietors and designers are close to or listed below their pandemic lows, underperforming the broader stock market by a substantial margin. Some bonds backed by workplace loans are likewise showing signs of stress. The Wall Street Journal published a short article highlighting this trend and the pressure on real estate worths, keeping in mind that this activity in the CRE bond market is the most current sign that the increasing interest rates are impacting the commercial residential or commercial property sector.10 Realty funds normally base their valuations on appraisals, which can be sluggish to show developing market conditions. This has kept fund assessments high, even as the real estate market has actually deteriorated, highlighting the challenges that many neighborhood banks deal with in determining the current market price of CRE residential or commercial properties.

In addition, the CRE outlook is being affected by higher reliance on remote work, which is consequently affecting the use case for big office complex. Many business office developers are seeing the shifts in how and where individuals work - and the accompanying patterns in the office sector - as opportunities to consider alternate usages for office residential or commercial properties. Therefore, banks should consider the prospective ramifications of this remote work pattern on the need for office and, in turn, the property quality of their workplace loans.

Key Risk Factors to Watch

A confluence of factors has actually caused a number of crucial risks affecting the CRE sector that deserve highlighting.

Maturity/refinance risk: Many fixed-rate workplace loans will be maturing in the next couple of years. Borrowers that were locked into low interest rates might deal with payment obstacles when their loans reprice at much higher rates - in some cases, double the original rate. Also, future refinance activity might need an extra equity contribution, potentially producing more monetary pressure for borrowers. Some banks have actually begun using bridge funding to tide over specific borrowers till rates reverse course. Increasing risk to net operating earnings (NOI): Market participants are pointing out increasing costs for products such as energies, residential or commercial property taxes, maintenance, insurance coverage, and labor as a concern because of heightened inflation levels. Inflation could trigger a structure's operating costs to rise faster than rental earnings, putting pressure on NOI. Declining asset value: CRE residential or commercial properties have actually recently experienced significant rate modifications relative to pre-pandemic times. An Ask the Fed session on CRE kept in mind that valuations (industrial/office) are below peak prices by as much as 30 percent in some sectors.11 This triggers an issue for the loan-to-value (LTV) ratio at origination and can easily put banks over their policy limits or run the risk of hunger. Another element affecting asset worths is low and lagging capitalization (cap) rates. Industry participants are having a tough time figuring out cap rates in the current environment due to the fact that of bad information, fewer transactions, rapid rate motions, and the unsure rate of interest path. If cap rates remain low and interest rates surpass them, it might result in a negative utilize situation for debtors. However, financiers expect to see increases in cap rates, which will adversely impact assessments, according to the CRE services and financial investment firm Coldwell Banker Richard Ellis (CBRE).12
nlihc.org
Modernizing Concentration Risk Management

Background

In early 2007, after observing the pattern of increasing concentrations in CRE for numerous years, the federal banking firms launched SR letter 07-1, "Interagency Guidance on Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate." 13 While the assistance did not set limitations on bank CRE concentration levels, it encouraged banks to enhance their risk management in order to manage and control CRE concentration threats.

Key Elements to a Robust CRE Risk Management Program

Many banks have actually because taken actions to align their CRE risk management framework with the crucial elements from the guidance:

- Board and management oversight

• Portfolio management
• Management information system (MIS).
• Market analysis.
• Credit underwriting standards.
• Portfolio tension testing and sensitivity analysis.
• Credit danger review function
  
  Over 15 years later on, these foundational elements still form the basis of a robust CRE danger management program. An efficient risk management program progresses with the changing danger profile of an institution. The following subsections broaden on 5 of the 7 elements noted in SR letter 07-1 and objective to highlight some best practices worth thinking about in this dynamic market environment that might improve and strengthen a bank's existing structure.
  
  Management Information System
  
  A robust MIS offers a bank's board of directors and management with the tools needed to proactively keep an eye on and manage CRE concentration danger. While lots of banks currently have an MIS that stratifies the CRE portfolio by market, residential or commercial property, and place, management may wish to consider additional ways to section the CRE loan portfolio. For instance, management might consider reporting borrowers dealing with increased re-finance danger due to interest rate changes. This information would aid a bank in identifying potential refinance danger, could help guarantee the precision of risk scores, and would facilitate proactive conversations with potential issue customers.
  
  Similarly, management may want to review deals funded throughout the realty valuation peak to identify residential or commercial properties that might currently be more conscious near-term assessment pressure or stabilization. Additionally, integrating information points, such as cap rates, into existing MIS could provide helpful information to the bank management and bank loan providers.
  
  Some banks have executed an improved MIS by utilizing central lease tracking systems that track lease expirations. This kind of data (specifically appropriate for office and retail areas) provides info that enables lenders to take a proactive approach to keeping track of for potential problems for a specific CRE loan.
  
  Market Analysis
  
  As noted previously, market conditions, and the resulting credit risk, vary throughout locations and residential or commercial property types. To the extent that data and information are available to an organization, bank management may think about additional segmenting market analysis information to finest recognize trends and risk factors. In large markets, such as Washington, D.C., or Atlanta, a more granular breakdown by submarkets (e.g., central downtown or suburban) may be relevant.
  
  However, in more rural counties, where available information are restricted, banks may consider engaging with their regional appraisal firms, professionals, or other community advancement groups for trend information or anecdotes. Additionally, the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis keeps the Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED), a public database with time series information at the county and national levels.14
  
  The very best market analysis is refrained from doing in a vacuum. If significant patterns are recognized, they might inform a bank's financing technique or be included into stress screening and capital planning.
  
  Credit Underwriting Standards
  
  During durations of market duress, it becomes progressively essential for loan providers to fully understand the financial condition of customers. Performing global cash flow analyses can guarantee that banks learn about commitments their debtors may have to other monetary organizations to decrease the threat of loss. Lenders needs to also consider whether low cap rates are pumping up residential or commercial property appraisals, and they should completely review appraisals to comprehend presumptions and growth forecasts. A reliable loan underwriting procedure thinks about stress/sensitivity analyses to much better capture the prospective changes in market conditions that could affect the ability of CRE residential or commercial properties to produce enough cash circulation to cover financial obligation service. For example, in addition to the usual requirements (financial obligation service coverage ratio and LTV ratio), a stress test may include a breakeven analysis for a residential or commercial property's net operating earnings by increasing business expenses or decreasing leas.
  
  A sound risk management process must identify and keep an eye on exceptions to a bank's financing policies, such as loans with longer interest-only periods on stabilized CRE residential or commercial properties, a higher reliance on guarantor support, nonrecourse loans, or other discrepancies from internal loan policies. In addition, a bank's MIS ought to offer adequate information for a bank's board of directors and senior management to examine risks in CRE loan portfolios and determine the volume and trend of exceptions to loan policies.
  
  Additionally, as residential or commercial property conversions (believe office to multifamily) continue to emerge in significant markets, lenders might have proactive conversations with investor, owners, and operators about alternative uses of realty space. Identifying alternative prepare for a residential or commercial property early could help banks get ahead of the curve and minimize the risk of loss.
  
  Portfolio Stress Testing and Sensitivity Analysis
  
  Since the start of the pandemic, many banks have actually revamped their stress tests to focus more heavily on the CRE residential or commercial properties most adversely affected, such as hotels, workplace area, and retail. While this focus may still be relevant in some geographical locations, reliable stress tests need to evolve to think about new types of post-pandemic scenarios. As talked about in the CRE-related Ask the Fed webinar mentioned earlier, 54 percent of the participants kept in mind that the top CRE issue for their bank was maturity/refinance danger, followed by unfavorable leverage (18 percent) and the inability to properly establish CRE worths (14 percent). stress tests to catch the worst of these concerns might provide insightful info to inform capital planning. This process might also provide loan officers details about borrowers who are especially vulnerable to rates of interest boosts and, thus, proactively inform workout strategies for these customers.
  
  Board and Management Oversight
  
  As with any danger stripe, a bank's board of directors is ultimately accountable for setting the threat cravings for the organization. For CRE concentration risk management, this means developing policies, procedures, danger limitations, and financing techniques. Further, directors and management require a pertinent MIS that provides enough information to examine a bank's CRE danger exposure. While all of the products pointed out earlier have the potential to enhance a bank's concentration risk management structure, the bank's board of directors is responsible for establishing the risk profile of the institution. Further, an effective board authorizes policies, such as the tactical strategy and capital plan, that line up with the danger profile of the organization by considering concentration limits and sublimits, as well as underwriting standards.
  
  Community banks continue to hold substantial concentrations of CRE, while many market indicators and emerging trends point to a combined performance that depends on residential or commercial property types and location. As market players adjust to today's progressing environment, lenders require to remain alert to modifications in CRE market conditions and the threat profiles of their CRE loan portfolios. Adapting concentration risk management practices in this changing landscape will make sure that banks are prepared to weather any possible storms on the horizon.
  
  * The authors thank Bryson Alexander, research expert, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond; Brian Bailey, commercial property topic professional and senior policy advisor, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta; and Kevin Brown, advanced examiner, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, for their contributions to this short article.
  
  1 The November 2022 Financial Stability Report released by the Board of Governors highlighted several crucial actions taken by the Federal Reserve following the 2007-2009 financial crisis that have actually promoted the resilience of financial organizations. This report is offered at www.federalreserve.gov/publications/files/financial-stability-report-20221104.pdf. 2 See Kyle Binder, Emily Greenwald, Sam Schulhofer-Wohl, and Alejandro H. Drexler, "Bank Exposure to Commercial Realty and the COVID-19 Pandemic," Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, 2021, readily available at www.chicagofed.org/publications/chicago-fed-letter/2021/463. 3 The November 2022 Supervision and Regulation Report launched by the Board of Governors specifies concentrations as follows: "A bank is considered concentrated if its building and land advancement loans to tier 1 capital plus reserves is higher than or equivalent to one hundred percent or if its total CRE loans (consisting of owner-occupied loans) to tier 1 capital plus reserves is greater than or equivalent to 300 percent." Note that this approach of measurement is more conservative than what is laid out in Supervision and Regulation (SR) letter 07-1, "Interagency Guidance on Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate," because it consists of owner-occupied loans and does rule out the half development rate throughout the prior 36 months. SR letter 07-1 is offered at www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/srletters/2007/SR0701.htm, and the November 2022 Supervision and Regulation Report is readily available at www.federalreserve.gov/publications/files/202211-supervision-and-regulation-report.pdf. 4 See SR letter 07-1, offered at www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/srletters/2007/SR0701.htm.
  
  5 Using Call Report information, we found that, since December 31, 2022, 31 percent of all banks had building and construction and land advancement loans to tier 1 capital plus reserves greater than or equivalent to 100 percent and/or overall CRE loans (including owner-occupied loans) to tier 1 capital plus reserves greater than 300 percent. As kept in mind in footnote 3, this is a more conservative measure than the SR letter 07-1 measure because it includes owner-occupied loans and does not consider the half development rate throughout the previous 36 months. 6 See the November 2022 Supervision and Regulation Report.
  
  7 See Arpit Gupta, Vrinda Mittal, and Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh, "Work from Home and the Office Real Estate Apocalypse," November 26, 2022, readily available at https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4124698. 8 See Natalie Wong and John Gittelsohn, "Wall Street Banks Are Exploring Sales of Office Loans in the U.S.," American Banker, November 11, 2022, available at www.americanbanker.com/articles/wall-street-banks-are-exploring-sales-of-office-loans-in-the-u-s. 9 An Ask the Fed session provided by Brian Bailey on November 16, 2022, highlighted the considerable volume of workplace loans at fixed and drifting rates set to mature in the coming years. In 2023 alone, almost $30.2 billion in floating rate and $32.3 billion in fixed rate workplace loans will develop. This Ask the Fed session is available at https://bsr.stlouisfed.org/askthefed/Home/ArchiveCall/329. 10 See Konrad Putzier and Peter Grant, "Investors Yank Money from Commercial-Property Funds, Pressuring Real-Estate Values," Wall Street Journal, December 6, 2022, offered at www.wsj.com/articles/investors-yank-money-from-commercial-property-funds-pressuring-real-estate-values-11670293325. 11 See the November 16, 2022, Ask the Fed session, which existed by Brian Bailey and is available at https://bsr.stlouisfed.org/askthefed/Home/ArchiveCall/329. 12 See "U.S. Cap Rate Survey H1 2022," CBRE, 2022, readily available at www.cbre.com/insights/reports/us-cap-rate-survey-h1-2022.