GitLab

For Christmas I got an intriguing gift from a good friend - my really own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a couple of simple triggers about me provided by my friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of composing, however it's also a bit recurring, and extremely verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's triggers in collating data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repeated hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had offered around 150,000 books, asteroidsathome.net primarily in the US, since pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, based on an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can purchase any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody creating one in anyone's name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, created by AI, and setiathome.berkeley.edu developed "entirely to bring humour and delight".

Legally, wiki.dulovic.tech the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is meant as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get offered further.

He wishes to widen his range, generating different genres such as sci-fi, and possibly offering an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - selling AI-generated products to human customers.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you write for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we really imply human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is photos. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not believe the use of generative AI for creative functions must be prohibited, but I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without approval ought to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very powerful but let's construct it fairly and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually chosen to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have decided to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to use developers' content on the internet to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also highly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of joy," says the Baroness, photorum.eclat-mauve.fr who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening one of its finest carrying out markets on the vague pledge of growth."

A federal government representative said: "No relocation will be made until we are definitely positive we have a useful plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for best holders to help them license their content, access to top quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's new AI strategy, a national information library containing public data from a large range of sources will likewise be offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector required to share details of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is stated to desire the AI sector to face less policy.

This comes as a variety of claims versus AI firms, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been secured by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their consent, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and championsleage.review are for users.atw.hu that reason exempt. There are a number of factors which can constitute fair usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training information and whether it must be paying for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It became the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for a portion of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, engel-und-waisen.de and threatens American's present supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I actually desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It is complete of errors and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to check out in parts because it's so verbose.

But given how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm unsure the length of time I can stay confident that my substantially slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant developments in international technology, with analysis from BBC reporters worldwide.

Outside the UK? Register here.