GitLab

Our brand-new Deepseek-based AI states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl predictions from our new Deepseek-based AI trained to be better at forecasting

Share this post

No one can predict the future however at Lightning Rod Labs we are training AI to give it its finest shot. With approximately date news and a small however tough 14 Billion criterion model, our AI is boldly forecasting the unforeseeable. Join us as we attempt to address mankind's toughest questions.

Super Bowl Sunday is almost upon us and, just as two years earlier, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the statistics are well studied, there remain numerous pressing concerns that are less simple to select. Our business, Lightning arrester Labs, has actually been mining questions from locations like polymarket.com and training a large language design to be much better at predicting the future (and have actually seen some intriguing improvements - research study paper inbound). Today we turned its cold, calculating eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can provide us some insight into the finer points of what we can expect this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world sign up for biolink.palcurr.com my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion specification design which is in fact on the smaller sized side. (Some estimates recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION criteria and trained using 8000 H100 GPUs. We used 8.) Additionally, its understanding cutoff is from many months ago so we have constructed an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each question we offer the news and watch as the AI reasons its way through unknown territory to make its best forecast possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We posed the following concerns to our AI and evaluated its reaction. While we have actually seen prediction improvements from our training, utilize these estimates for prop betting at your own hazard.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% chance

Therefore it appears this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI thinks Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock strong, but a little too private for a post-Super Bowl proposal. Plus got ta aspect in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposal ...

First, I'll look at the bottom lines from the short articles. Travis has actually remained in a relationship with Taylor since 2023. He's a big football star, and she's been supportive of his profession, attending his video games. They appear to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has actually even invited her family and friends to the Super Bowl, revealing her dedication.

Some fans are thrilled, while others, specifically Swifties, are a bit uncertain, particularly given comments Travis made about Donald Trump going to the Super Bowl. That has triggered some Swifties to question how suitable Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship private and not addressing the speculation straight.

I think the bottom lines are the speculation and his incredibly elusive responses. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an essential event, the chances and his responses recommend it's more of a possibility rather than a certainty. I 'd estimate a low likelihood, possibly around 5%, considering all elements.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the super bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% possibility

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from utilizing their signature "tush-push" move, now its simply a different front-tush being pushed. Will an AI comprehend what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even know what a "tush" is? Will it factor in that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) Josh Allen's similar attempts? Looks like our AI thinks they'll be utilizing Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again throughout this video game.

Alright, I'm trying to determine the probability that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the Super Bowl. First, I need to understand exactly what a "tush-push" is. From the articles, it seems like it's a method where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to press off defenders. It's compared to pressing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and strategy.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to perform the move. The post points out that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this strategy, which is pretty high. ... I also need to think of the protective strategies of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs know the Eagles' "tush-push" technique, they might change their defense appropriately, which could either increase or reduce the variety of times the Eagles use it.

Considering that more than five looks like a significant number but possible provided their confidence, I would estimate a probability around 60-70% possibility. This represents their preparation, self-confidence in the strategy, and the likelihood that they'll use it several times, specifically if it works early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump during the halftime program efficiency?

AI Final Prediction: 65% chance

While our AI might not be like us when it pertains to consciousness, a soul, or any physical symptom, it certainly has viewpoints on Kendrick Lamar. It was quite uncertain, waffling backward and forward, but in the end it thinks Kendrick isn't going to pull back from a fight.

From the short articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of slamming Trump. He's done this in his tunes, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a declaration throughout a previous halftime show when Trump existed in 2018. That seems substantial due to the fact that it shows he's done it before, so possibly he'll do it again. But wait, taking a look at more recent short articles, it mentions that Lamar is moving far from political statements and focusing more on individual expression. That might suggest he's less likely to address Trump this time.

However, he's also associated with a fight with Drake, which might offer him factors to make some public declarations, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal problems his track "Not Like Us." There's a character assassination fit from Drake, so perhaps he's careful about including any questionable tunes in the efficiency. But because he won the Grammys for that track, he may still desire to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a high-profile occasion, Lamar may feel compelled to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to avoid political declarations throughout the halftime show, so there's a risk that such content might be restricted or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making vibrant carry on huge phases. He's the very first solo rap act to headline the halftime program, which may offer him more creative freedom. Plus, his past behavior recommends he's not shy about revealing his viewpoints, even in public efficiencies.

But I likewise remember reading that Lamar expressed fatigue about criticizing Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might indicate he's less inspired to raise Trump this time around, specifically if he's concentrating on his feud with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past habits, current shifts in focus, legal concerns, and the occasion's context-the probability seems to be moderately high, perhaps around 65%.

Will Andy Reid consume a cheeseburger on screen after the super bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% possibility

Lets be sincere, Andy Reid likes cheeseburgers. And who does not? Will the reality that our AI has never ever tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its prediction? Looks like theres rather of a possibility that if the chiefs taste victory, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the posts, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid consuming a cheeseburger throughout a Super Bowl celebration. Bradshaw later said sorry for the joke, saying he didn't indicate to cause offense which he in fact found it funny himself. Reid seemed to take it in stride, which might suggest he's the type to laugh it off rather than getting upset.

Looking at the articles, it points out that Andy Reid is a food lover and likes cheeseburgers. There's a short article specifically about his love for food, which suggests that he's a person who delights in eating, specifically with his team. So, if there were strategies to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, particularly if the scenario is on screen for a celebration.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% possibility

"Tails never ever fails?" You can't deceive the makers !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have actually been forecasting the coin toss and 53% are predicting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 super bowls. Potentially financially rewarding? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be tricked and thinks anything can occur when that coin enters the air.

Okay, so I'm attempting to find out the possibility that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I understand that a coin toss is expected to be 50/50, however there's some historic information that might influence this forecast.

First, I go through the articles supplied. They all point out the historical stats of Super Bowl coin tosses. It appears like tails has actually come up more often than heads traditionally. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the outcome 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has actually been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based simply on history, tails has a slight edge, but it's not a substantial difference.

However, I keep in mind that the outcome of a coin toss is usually thought about random. The slight historical edge for tails might be due to chance. But when making predictions, often individuals weigh historic information even if it's not statistically significant. So, I should consider whether this historical bias ought to affect the likelihood.

After thinking of it, I decide that while the historic data shows a slight choice for tails, it's not statistically significant adequate to move the likelihood far from 0.5. So, I'll opt for 0.5 as the possibility, acknowledging that the slight historic edge exists but doesn't bypass the fact that each toss is an independent 50/50 event.

Will the referees cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% opportunity

We get it, you believe the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I assure we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training information) I would most likely believe the very same. BUT, its authorities now since our AI says the possibilities are just 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still kind of high when it pertains to scams on a national scale). Looks like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm trying to determine the likelihood that the referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, wiki.snooze-hotelsoftware.de that's a pretty major accusation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a lot of short articles that speak about conspiracy theories suggesting referees are prejudiced towards the Chiefs. People are indicating some doubtful calls in current video games, specifically the AFC National championship. That does appear to trigger some uncertainty. I can see why fans may get annoyed when their group loses due to what they view as bad officiating.

But then I read that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "preposterous" and "absurd." They state there's no proof of systematic bias. That's a strong statement from individuals in charge. If they're rejecting it, it may suggest there's no genuine basis or they would have resolved it differently if there was some fact to it.

Looking at the posts, several sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise pointed out that statistical analysis doesn't show any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For example, Mike Pereira from FOX said information reveals the Chiefs have actually been penalized more given that 2022. That's interesting because if they were getting unique treatment, you might anticipate fewer charges, right?

...

So, putting it all together, the likelihood that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is most likely very low. Maybe not zero since you can't eliminate every possibility, however exceptionally unlikely.

Summary

There you have it everyone, is it even worth viewing the video game still? I guess I'll need to wait and see how the game turns out before we release this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for a good game! And hey, if it turns out our AI was incorrect about everything, at least it can gain from this.