GitLab

OAKLAND, Calif. (AP) - Elon Musk's lawyers took on with OpenAI in court Tuesday as a federal judge weighed the billionaire's ask for a court order that would block the ChatGPT maker from converting itself to a for-profit company.

U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said it was a "stretch" for Musk to claim he will be irreparably harmed if she does not intervene to stop OpenAI from progressing with its shift from a not-for-profit lab to a for-profit corporation.

But the judge likewise raised issues about OpenAI and its relationship with organization partner Microsoft and said she wouldn't stop the case from relocating to trial as quickly as next year so a jury can decide.

"It is plausible that what Mr. Musk is stating is true. We ´ ll find out. He ´ ll sit on the stand," she said.

Musk, an early OpenAI investor and board member, took legal action against the expert system business in 2015, initially in a California state court and koha-community.cz later in federal court, declaring it had actually betrayed its founding aims as a nonprofit research lab benefiting the public great. Musk had actually about $45 million in the startup from its founding up until 2018, his lawyer said Tuesday.

Musk intensified the legal disagreement late in 2015, adding brand-new claims and defendants and requesting a court order that would stop OpenAI ´ s prepares to transform itself into a for-profit service more totally. Musk likewise included his own AI business, xAI, opentx.cz as a plaintiff.

Also targeted by Musk's claim is OpenAI's close company partner Microsoft and tech entrepreneur Reid Hoffman, a previous OpenAI board member who also sits on Microsoft's board.

Gonzalez Rogers said she has a high bar for authorizing the sort of initial injunction that Musk wants however hasn't yet ruled on the request. She did state she had "considerable concerns" with two people connected to Microsoft on OpenAI's board - Hoffman and long time Microsoft executive Deanna Templeton, who was a "non-voting observer."

"So you desire me to believe that she was sitting there listening to all the conversations and not telling anyone? What would the point be for her to sit there and listen to everyone, if not to communicate what she was listening? There would be no point for her to be there, which is why she in fact ought to not exist," she said.

Hoffman, a co-founder of LinkedIn, drapia.org has been on Microsoft ´ s board because shortly after the tech giant purchased the job networking site. He stepped down from OpenAI's board in 2023 to avoid conflicts with his AI start-up, Inflection.

Templeton, who Musk likewise called as an accused, was added as a non-voting member of OpenAI ´ s board in the consequences of Altman ´ s ouster after Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella looked for more stability on the board. But months later, she was dropped from the OpenAI board as U.S. antitrust enforcers were revealing issues about such plans on business boards.

The judge has actually managed a variety of tech market cases consisting of Apple's fight with Epic Games, though she said Tuesday that Musk's case is "nothing like" that one. That case was also the last time she granted a preliminary injunction, in 2020, 8 months before the case went to trial.

Then-President Barack Obama selected Gonzalez Rogers to the federal bench in 2011.

Tuesday's hearing was initially set for January but was postponed after Musk's attorney Marc Toberoff said his house was destroyed in the Pacific Palisades wildfire.

Musk, funsilo.date who did not attend the hearing, has declared in the claim that the companies are breaking the terms of his fundamental contributions to the charity. Judge Gonzalez Rogers called it a "stretch" to claim "irreversible harm" to Musk, bybio.co and called the case "billionaires vs. billionaires." She questioned why Musk invested 10s of millions in OpenAI without a written agreement. Toberoff said it was due to the fact that the relationship in between Altman and Musk at the time was "constructed on trust" and the two were extremely close.

"That is simply a great deal of cash" to invest "on a handshake," the judge said.

OpenAI has said Musk ´ s asked for court order would "incapacitate OpenAI ´ s business"and mission to the benefit of Musk and his own AI business and is based on "far-fetched" legal claims.

At the heart of the disagreement is a 2017 internal power struggle at the fledgling startup that caused Altman becoming OpenAI ´ s CEO

. Emails divulged by OpenAI show Musk had likewise sought to be CEO and grew disappointed after 2 other OpenAI co-founders said he would hold too much power as a major shareholder and president if the startup was successful in its objective to attain better-than-human AI known as artificial basic intelligence, or AGI. Musk has actually long voiced concerns about how innovative kinds of AI might threaten humanity.

Altman ultimately prospered in becoming CEO and has actually remained so except for a duration in 2023 when he was fired and after that restored days later on after the board that ousted him was changed.

OpenAI has sought to demonstrate Musk ´ s early assistance for the concept of making OpenAI a for-profit organization so it might raise cash for the hardware and computer power that AI needs.

Musk is not the only one tough OpenAI's for-profit transition. Facebook and Instagram parent Meta Platforms has actually asked California's attorney general of the United States to obstruct it, and the workplace of Delaware's attorney general of the United States has said it is examining the conversion.

It was not clear Tuesday when the case might go to trial. Musk's attorneys initially said they would be all set by June after some back-and-forth with the 2 sides the judge indicated it most likely will not be until June 2026 at the earliest, however likely early 2027.

O'Brien reported from Providence, Rhode Island.

-------