GitLab

Our new Deepseek-based AI states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl forecasts from our new Deepseek-based AI trained to be better at forecasting

Share this post

No one can predict the future however at Lightning arrester Labs we are training AI to offer it its best shot. With as much as date news and a little however feisty 14 Billion specification design, our AI is boldly anticipating the unpredictable. Join us as we try to answer mankind's toughest questions.

Super Bowl Sunday is almost upon us and, just as 2 years ago, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread presently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the statistics are well studied, there remain many pushing concerns that are less simple to select. Our company, Lightning arrester Labs, has actually been mining concerns from places like polymarket.com and training a large language design to be much better at forecasting the future (and have seen some intriguing improvements - term paper incoming). This week we turned its cold, computing eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can give us some insight into the finer points of what we can expect this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world sign up for my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion criterion model which is actually on the smaller sized side. (Some estimates recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION parameters and trained utilizing 8000 H100 GPUs. We used 8.) Additionally, its knowledge cutoff is from many months earlier so we have actually developed an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we provide the news and watch as the AI reasons its method through unknown territory to make its finest prediction possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We posed the following concerns to our AI and gauged its reaction. While we have actually seen prediction enhancements from our training, utilize these estimates for prop betting at your own danger.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% opportunity

Therefore it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI believes Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock solid, but a little too private for a post-Super Bowl proposition. Plus got ta factor in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposition ...

First, I'll take a look at the key points from the short articles. Travis has actually remained in a relationship with Taylor since 2023. He's a huge football star, and she's been encouraging of his career, attending his games. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has actually even invited her pals and family to the Super Bowl, wiki.dulovic.tech showing her dedication.

Some fans are thrilled, while others, particularly Swifties, are a bit uncertain, higgledy-piggledy.xyz especially given comments Travis made about Donald Trump participating in the Super Bowl. That has triggered some Swifties to question how appropriate Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship personal and not addressing the speculation straight.

I think the bottom lines are the speculation and his incredibly elusive answers. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an important occasion, the chances and his reactions suggest it's more of a possibility rather than a certainty. I 'd approximate a low possibility, maybe around 5%, thinking about all elements.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the very bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% possibility

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from using their signature "tush-push" move, now its simply a various front-tush being pushed. Will an AI understand what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even know what a "tush" is? Will it consider that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) Josh Allen's comparable efforts? Appears like our AI thinks they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again throughout this video game.

Alright, I'm trying to determine the probability that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the Super Bowl. First, I need to comprehend what exactly a "tush-push" is. From the short articles, it appears like it's a technique where the quarterback, wakewiki.de in this case Jalen Hurts, uses his legs and lower body strength to press off protectors. It's compared to pushing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and method.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to perform the move. The short article points out that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this strategy, which is pretty high. ... I likewise need to think of the protective strategies of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs are conscious of the Eagles' "tush-push" technique, they might adjust their defense accordingly, which could either increase or decrease the number of times the Eagles utilize it.

Considering that more than five looks like a significant number but possible given their confidence, I would approximate a likelihood around 60-70% chance. This accounts for their preparation, confidence in the method, and the possibility that they'll utilize it a number of times, especially if it works early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump during the halftime program performance?

AI Final Prediction: 65% chance

While our AI might not resemble us when it pertains to awareness, a soul, or any physical symptom, it certainly has opinions on Kendrick Lamar. It was quite uncertain, waffling back and forth, however in the end it believes Kendrick isn't going to pull back from a battle.

From the posts, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of slamming Trump. He's done this in his tunes, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a statement throughout a previous halftime show when Trump was present in 2018. That seems significant since it reveals he's done it in the past, so possibly he'll do it again. But wait, taking a look at more recent short articles, it points out that Lamar is moving far from political declarations and focusing more on personal expression. That might suggest he's less likely to address Trump this time.

However, he's also associated with a fight with Drake, which may provide him to make some public statements, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal issues surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a defamation match from Drake, so possibly he's mindful about including any questionable songs in the performance. But considering that he won the Grammys for that track, he may still wish to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a high-profile occasion, Lamar may feel compelled to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to avoid political declarations throughout the halftime program, so there's a danger that such material may be restricted or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making vibrant moves on huge stages. He's the very first solo rap act to headline the halftime show, which may offer him more creative freedom. Plus, his previous behavior suggests he's not shy about revealing his opinions, even in public efficiencies.

But I also keep in mind reading that Lamar expressed tiredness about slamming Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That could suggest he's less encouraged to raise Trump this time around, specifically if he's concentrating on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past behavior, existing shifts in focus, legal issues, and the occasion's context-the possibility appears to be reasonably high, possibly around 65%.

Will Andy Reid consume a cheeseburger on screen after the incredibly bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% chance

Lets be truthful, Andy Reid likes cheeseburgers. And who doesn't? Will the reality that our AI has never tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh hamburger taint its prediction? Looks like theres rather of an opportunity that if the chiefs taste success, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the posts, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid eating a cheeseburger throughout a Super Bowl celebration. Bradshaw later said sorry for the joke, stating he didn't suggest to cause offense and that he in fact found it humorous himself. Reid appeared to take it in stride, which might indicate he's the type to laugh it off instead of getting upset.

Taking a look at the articles, it points out that Andy Reid is a food enthusiast and loves cheeseburgers. There's a short article particularly about his love for food, which recommends that he's a person who takes pleasure in eating, especially with his group. So, if there were plans to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would partake in a cheeseburger, specifically if the situation is on screen for a celebration.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% possibility

"Tails never ever fails?" You can't trick the machines !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have actually been anticipating the coin toss and 53% are predicting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 extremely bowls. Potentially rewarding? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be fooled and thinks anything can take place when that coin enters the air.

Okay, so I'm trying to figure out the probability that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I know that a coin toss is expected to be 50/50, but there's some historic information that might affect this forecast.

First, I check out the short articles supplied. They all point out the historical data of Super Bowl coin tosses. It seems like tails has shown up regularly than heads historically. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the result 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based simply on history, tails has a minor edge, but it's not a substantial distinction.

However, I keep in mind that the outcome of a coin toss is normally considered random. The minor historic edge for suvenir51.ru tails might be due to opportunity. But when making predictions, in some cases individuals weigh historical data even if it's not statistically considerable. So, I should consider whether this historic bias ought to influence the possibility.

After believing about it, I choose that while the historical data reveals a minor choice for tails, it's not statistically considerable adequate to move the likelihood away from 0.5. So, I'll opt for 0.5 as the possibility, acknowledging that the small historic edge exists however does not override the reality that each toss is an independent 50/50 occasion.

Will the referees cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% chance

We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I guarantee we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training information) I would most likely believe the very same. BUT, its authorities now because our AI states the opportunities are only 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still sort of high when it pertains to fraud on a national scale). Appears like the Chiefs will need to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm trying to find out the possibility that the referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a pretty serious accusation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a great deal of articles that discuss conspiracy theories recommending referees are biased towards the Chiefs. People are indicating some questionable calls in recent games, especially the AFC Championship Game. That does appear to spark some uncertainty. I can see why fans may get irritated when their group loses due to what they perceive as bad officiating.

But then I read that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "outrageous" and "ludicrous." They say there's no evidence of systematic bias. That's a strong statement from the people in charge. If they're denying it, it might imply there's no real basis or they would have resolved it in a different way if there was some fact to it.

Looking at the posts, a number of sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the authorities are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise pointed out that statistical analysis does not reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For circumstances, Mike Pereira from FOX said data shows the Chiefs have been penalized more considering that 2022. That's fascinating due to the fact that if they were getting special treatment, you might anticipate less penalties, right?

...

So, putting everything together, the probability that referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is most likely extremely low. Maybe not zero since you can't dismiss every possibility, however extremely not likely.

Summary

There you have it everybody, is it even worth enjoying the game still? I guess I'll need to wait and see how the game ends up before we unleash this upon the stock market. Fingers crossed for a good game! And hi, if it turns out our AI was wrong about whatever, a minimum of it can gain from this.