GitLab

Our new Deepseek-based AI says "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl forecasts from our new Deepseek-based AI trained to be better at forecasting

Share this post

No one can forecast the future but at Lightning Rod Labs we are training AI to give it its finest shot. With approximately date news and a small however spirited 14 Billion specification design, our AI is boldly anticipating the unpredictable. Join us as we attempt to answer mankind's hardest questions.

Super Bowl Sunday is nearly upon us and, simply as two years ago, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the statistics are well studied, forum.pinoo.com.tr there remain numerous pushing questions that are less simple to select. Our company, Lightning arrester Labs, has been mining questions from places like polymarket.com and training a big language model to be better at anticipating the future (and have seen some interesting enhancements - research study paper incoming). This week we turned its cold, determining eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can give us some insight into the finer points of what we can anticipate this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world register for my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion specification design which is in fact on the smaller sized side. (Some quotes recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION specifications and trained using 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its understanding cutoff is from lots of months back so we have built an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we offer the news and watch as the AI reasons its way through unidentified territory to make its finest forecast possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We presented the following concerns to our AI and gauged its action. While we have seen prediction enhancements from our training, use these price quotes for prop wagering at your own hazard.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% opportunity

And so it appears this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI believes Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock strong, however a little too private for a post-Super Bowl proposition. Plus got ta element in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposition ...

First, I'll take a look at the key points from the short articles. Travis has actually remained in a relationship with Taylor akropolistravel.com given that 2023. He's a big football star, higgledy-piggledy.xyz and she's been supportive of his career, attending his video games. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has actually even invited her loved ones to the Super Bowl, showing her dedication.

Some fans are thrilled, while others, particularly Swifties, are a bit uncertain, particularly provided comments Travis made about Donald Trump participating in the Super Bowl. That has triggered some Swifties to question how ideal Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple seems to be keeping their relationship personal and not resolving the speculation straight.

I believe the bottom lines are the speculation and his incredibly elusive answers. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is a crucial event, the odds and his reactions suggest it's more of a possibility rather than a certainty. I 'd estimate a low possibility, perhaps around 5%, thinking about all aspects.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the super bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% opportunity

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from using their signature "tush-push" move, now its simply a various front-tush being pushed. Will an AI comprehend what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even know what a "tush" is? Will it consider that the Chiefs stopped (controversy aside) Josh Allen's similar efforts? Appears like our AI believes they'll be utilizing Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again during this video game.

Alright, I'm trying to find out the likelihood that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the Super Bowl. First, I require to comprehend just what a "tush-push" is. From the short articles, it looks like it's a method where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, uses his legs and lower body strength to push off defenders. It's compared to pushing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and technique.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts utilizes his leg strength, having actually done a 600-pound squat, to execute the relocation. The article points out that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this method, which is pretty high. ... I also require to think of the protective methods of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs know the Eagles' "tush-push" strategy, they might adjust their defense accordingly, which might either increase or decrease the variety of times the Eagles utilize it.

Considering that more than five looks like a significant number but possible provided their self-confidence, I would approximate a likelihood around 60-70% opportunity. This represents their preparation, self-confidence in the strategy, and the likelihood that they'll use it several times, particularly if it works early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump during the halftime program performance?

AI Final Prediction: 65% opportunity

While our AI may not be like us when it pertains to awareness, a soul, or any physical symptom, it certainly has viewpoints on . It was pretty uncertain, waffling back and forth, however in the end it thinks Kendrick isn't going to back down from a battle.

From the articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of criticizing Trump. He's done this in his tunes, forum.altaycoins.com like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a declaration throughout a previous halftime show when Trump existed in 2018. That appears significant since it reveals he's done it previously, so possibly he'll do it again. But wait, taking a look at more recent posts, it points out that Lamar is moving away from political declarations and focusing more on individual expression. That could mean he's less most likely to resolve Trump this time.

However, he's likewise associated with a fight with Drake, which may give him factors to make some public declarations, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal concerns surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a disparagement match from Drake, so maybe he's careful about consisting of any controversial tunes in the efficiency. But considering that he won the Grammys for that track, he might still want to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a high-profile occasion, Lamar may feel obliged to make a statement. However, the NFL tends to prevent political declarations during the halftime program, so there's a risk that such content might be restricted or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a track record of making vibrant carry on huge stages. He's the very first solo rap act to headline the halftime program, which may give him more creative freedom. Plus, his previous habits suggests he's not shy about expressing his opinions, even in public performances.

But I likewise keep in mind reading that Lamar revealed fatigue about criticizing Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might indicate he's less motivated to raise Trump this time around, especially if he's focusing on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past habits, current shifts in focus, legal concerns, and the occasion's context-the possibility seems to be moderately high, perhaps around 65%.

Will Andy Reid eat a cheeseburger on screen after the extremely bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% possibility

Lets be sincere, Andy Reid likes cheeseburgers. And who doesn't? Will the reality that our AI has never tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its prediction? Appears like theres rather of a possibility that if the chiefs taste victory, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the posts, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid eating a cheeseburger during a Super Bowl event. Bradshaw later said sorry for the joke, stating he didn't mean to trigger offense and that he in fact found it amusing himself. Reid appeared to take it in stride, which might show he's the type to laugh it off rather than getting upset.

Taking a look at the posts, it mentions that Andy Reid is a food lover and loves cheeseburgers. There's an article particularly about his love for food, which suggests that he's an individual who takes pleasure in consuming, specifically with his team. So, if there were strategies to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would engage in a cheeseburger, especially if the scenario is on screen for an event.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% possibility

"Tails never fails?" You can't deceive the machines !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have actually been forecasting the coin toss and 53% are predicting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 very bowls. Potentially financially rewarding? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be tricked and believes anything can happen when that coin goes in the air.

Okay, so I'm attempting to figure out the possibility that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I know that a coin toss is expected to be 50/50, but there's some historical information that might affect this forecast.

First, I go through the posts supplied. They all discuss the historic stats of Super Bowl coin tosses. It appears like tails has turned up more frequently than heads traditionally. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has been the outcome 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which is about 48%. So, based simply on history, tails has a small edge, but it's not a big difference.

However, I keep in mind that the result of a coin toss is generally thought about random. The minor historical edge for tails might be due to chance. But when making forecasts, sometimes individuals weigh historical data even if it's not statistically substantial. So, I should think about whether this historic predisposition ought to influence the possibility.

After believing about it, I choose that while the historic data shows a minor choice for tails, it's not statistically significant sufficient to move the possibility far from 0.5. So, I'll opt for 0.5 as the likelihood, acknowledging that the slight historical edge exists but does not bypass the reality that each toss is an independent 50/50 event.

Will the referees cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% possibility

We get it, you believe the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I promise we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training data) I would probably think the very same. BUT, its official now since our AI states the possibilities are just 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still sort of high when it pertains to scams on a national scale). Appears like the Chiefs will need to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm trying to figure out the possibility that the referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a pretty serious allegation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a lot of short articles that speak about conspiracy theories recommending referees are prejudiced towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some doubtful employ current games, particularly the AFC National championship. That does appear to trigger some uncertainty. I can see why fans might get irritated when their team loses due to what they perceive as bad officiating.

But then I read that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "preposterous" and "outrageous." They state there's no proof of organized bias. That's a strong statement from individuals in charge. If they're denying it, it might imply there's no genuine basis or they would have resolved it in a different way if there was some truth to it.

Taking a look at the posts, a number of sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the authorities are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They also mentioned that analytical analysis does not show any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For instance, Mike Pereira from FOX said information shows the Chiefs have actually been penalized more given that 2022. That's fascinating due to the fact that if they were getting special treatment, you might anticipate less penalties, right?

...

So, putting it all together, the probability that referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is probably really low. Maybe not zero since you can't dismiss every possibility, however extremely unlikely.

Summary

There you have it everybody, is it even worth watching the game still? I guess I'll have to wait and see how the video game turns out before we unleash this upon the stock market. Fingers crossed for an excellent game! And hey, if it ends up our AI was wrong about everything, at least it can gain from this.